Amazon EBS Enables Live Volume Modifications with Elastic Volumes(aws.amazon.com)
aws.amazon.com
Amazon EBS Enables Live Volume Modifications with Elastic Volumes
https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2017/02/amazon-elastic-block-store-amazon-ebs-enables-live-volume-modifications-with-elastic-volumes/
26 comments
Earlier post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13641499
I haven't done this in AWS yet, but I've been growing mounted block devices/disks Google Cloud for a while now. It's more or less just like growing a disk on a SAN.
You still have to grow the filesystem it self though, so if you're trying to grow the root mount, using a partitioned disk, and not using an abstraction like LVM you will need to reboot to be able to use the full disk.
Glad to see AWS catch up in this area.
You still have to grow the filesystem it self though, so if you're trying to grow the root mount, using a partitioned disk, and not using an abstraction like LVM you will need to reboot to be able to use the full disk.
Glad to see AWS catch up in this area.
I wonder if Linux can mimic the technique Microsoft uses to grow volumes and filesystems on the fly. It's something I've missed on the occasion. It's pretty slick.
A number of Linux filesystems support online resize. See this handy chart:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems#Res...
All my VMs have a separate /boot and ext4 as / (xfs would work, too).
With this setup - using KVM, mind you - I can change the disk size of the VM and resize the / filesystem inside by just using resize2fs, no need to reboot, umount or anything else.
With this setup - using KVM, mind you - I can change the disk size of the VM and resize the / filesystem inside by just using resize2fs, no need to reboot, umount or anything else.
The impression I got a long time ago was that it's potentially unsafe. Is that old information?
I have not read that anywhere, I did it many times without data loss or other issues.
You just need to use a relatively recent distro (Centos 6 +).
If you use xfs, watch out, you can grow a fs, but not shrink it - which is why I use ext4 when I want more flexibility.
If you use xfs, watch out, you can grow a fs, but not shrink it - which is why I use ext4 when I want more flexibility.
It depends on the filesystem but yes, it can.
Finally, I presume this lets us resize EBS volumes without having to do things like this: https://matt.berther.io/2015/02/03/how-to-resize-aws-ec2-ebs...
Let's say I have an EBS volume of 500GB with 300GB of data. What happens if I mistakenly resize the EBS volume to 200GB? Do I get an error message or does part of my data get wiped out?
Good news: you won't lose any data from resizing your EBS down.
Bad news: that's because you can't make your EBS smaller.
Bad news: that's because you can't make your EBS smaller.
> You can now increase volume size, adjust performance, or change the volume type while the volume is in use.
Yes, you are absolutely right. "EBS volumes can only be increased, not decreased".
There are third party solutions that support automatic/transparent rightsizing - both increase/decrease (FittedCloud).
And I think that's fair. Decreasing would be way too risky.
I fell there are better ways to protect your customers from data loss than forbidding a potentially-destructive action.
I'm quite happy to lose data, or manage my data's physical location on disk, and do online decreases… but I can't!
I'm quite happy to lose data, or manage my data's physical location on disk, and do online decreases… but I can't!
I suspect it's the underlying systems that aren't good at handling online decreases. But the good news is, if you're happy to lose data, you can just delete the volume and create a smaller one.
(Yes I know that's probably not what you meant, but it does highlight the question of what exactly is non-valuable data?)
(Yes I know that's probably not what you meant, but it does highlight the question of what exactly is non-valuable data?)
I'm too lazy to attach new storage, sync data, and swap their mount points in place.
> what exactly is non-valuable data?
[deleted]
Tried this just now. Spun up 8GB ec2+ebs instance. Booted and logged in as root. Deleted the root partition using fdisk, carefully recreated it from the same starting sector but to new 100GB capacity (check lsblk output to confirm). Then resize2fs /dev/xvda1 my ext4 FS. All online, hot. Obviously it's risky, but you can take a snapshot of the EBS before starting. Seems very nice for the common use case of slowly growing storage needs that are best served by a simple disk.
As usual, Jeff Barr's blog post is much more informative than the announcement.
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/amazon-ebs-update-new-elast...
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/amazon-ebs-update-new-elast...
[deleted]
I've been procrastinating on moving our app to aws because this was not supported, I was going to have to rewrite some horrible code to support using s3 for scaling (EFS is not in the new Canada region). This should save me a few hundred hours!
So can I change to spinners at night with low I/O to save on daytime costs with higher SSD IOPs? "Automate" with lambda seems like it begging for cost optimization as well.
I think you can only do this with gp2 and provisioned IOPS volumes.
In addition, you have to wait 6 hours before scaling again.
In addition, you have to wait 6 hours before scaling again.
We went with EFS for our RethinkDB instances on EC2. Was set up as a big data store, so read latency wasn't really an issue. Works well.
But that was before this announcement...nice addition AWS EBS team!
But that was before this announcement...nice addition AWS EBS team!