China Is Making Domain Name History(techcrunch.com)
techcrunch.com
China Is Making Domain Name History
http://techcrunch.com/2015/12/12/china-making-domain-name-history/
40 comments
One of the reasons the Chinese like these short numeric domain names is that they have a complex system of homophones where each number represents a word and a sequence of number can represent a whole sentence.
It apparent is not only that, it is also the way they use qwerty keyboards where short combinations of letters expand out to Chinese characters.
I'm a bit confused about the whole DNS thing.
Namely when I buy a domain name from who exactly am I buying it from?
Put in other words, what's the best way to buy a domain name and avoid the middleman fees?
In terms of renewal, does it make a difference if you buy it from the root TLD authority (not sure if saying something silly here) or some squatter/middle-man/domain-park?
Who decides on the price hike for the next year?
I find the whole DNS management quite broken. The new TLDs is a good example. .dev got owned by Google and a bunch of other TLDs got acquired by some VC backed digital-estate company.
Namely when I buy a domain name from who exactly am I buying it from?
Put in other words, what's the best way to buy a domain name and avoid the middleman fees?
In terms of renewal, does it make a difference if you buy it from the root TLD authority (not sure if saying something silly here) or some squatter/middle-man/domain-park?
Who decides on the price hike for the next year?
I find the whole DNS management quite broken. The new TLDs is a good example. .dev got owned by Google and a bunch of other TLDs got acquired by some VC backed digital-estate company.
The hierarchy of Internet domain names goes something like this:
ICANN -> TLD operator (registry) -> registrar -> reseller (optional) -> registrant (you)
ICANN -> TLD operator (registry) -> registrar -> reseller (optional) -> registrant (you)
So I found this article [1] about domain name transfer. Which clarified one doubt that I had. As I was under the impression that you were hopelessly stuck at paying rent for life middleman (to a reseller or in this case a registrar).
This raises another question. Is it worth starting you own registrar? Or it is fee prohibitive?
[1] http://lifehacker.com/5794507/how-to-jump-ship-from-godaddy-...
This raises another question. Is it worth starting you own registrar? Or it is fee prohibitive?
[1] http://lifehacker.com/5794507/how-to-jump-ship-from-godaddy-...
Registrars need to pay a yearly fee to ICANN (in the $xx,xxx range if I recall correctly) and significant startup fees as well.
This qualifies you to pay 'wholesale' prices for domain names. Wholesale prices are set by the registry. (e.g. Verisign sets the wholesale price for .com, Afilias for .org, etc.)
It is worth doing if you register a very large number of domain names, like 100,000+. Some large corporations have their own registrar, Google for example. (More recently Google has also entered the registry business, with their new TLDs.)
This qualifies you to pay 'wholesale' prices for domain names. Wholesale prices are set by the registry. (e.g. Verisign sets the wholesale price for .com, Afilias for .org, etc.)
It is worth doing if you register a very large number of domain names, like 100,000+. Some large corporations have their own registrar, Google for example. (More recently Google has also entered the registry business, with their new TLDs.)
Historically, who in this chain collected the seigniorage for domain names worth much more than the transaction cost, i.e., email.com? Just whoever snatched it up first, usually a reseller? I always wondered domain names weren't auctioned off like other scarce resources whose initial distribution is controlled by the government, such as wireless spectrum.
> Just whoever snatched it up first
Yes.
Yes.
My 3 letter .org turned 17 years old last week.
Not that I'm interested in selling, but nobody's ever tried to buy it from me for more than the registration fees. I feel left out.
Not that I'm interested in selling, but nobody's ever tried to buy it from me for more than the registration fees. I feel left out.
I feel like the trend in domain name "investing" is a fad.
I find myself googling for websites more than actually typing them out if they are not populated by recent history anyway.
I find myself googling for websites more than actually typing them out if they are not populated by recent history anyway.
Direct navigation is definitely becoming less common. The browser search bar, the awesome bar, and App Stores are increasingly becoming the ways that internet users reach their destinations.
Still, .com domain names continue their march up in value. It's been a ~20 year fad at this point.
Still, .com domain names continue their march up in value. It's been a ~20 year fad at this point.
Yup. And right now, people above a certain age raise an eyebrow when a domain is not a .com, or .co.uk, or .[something familiar].
But the more time goes on, the more we'll have users who just don't care if it's a .io, .xyz or .whatever.
But the more time goes on, the more we'll have users who just don't care if it's a .io, .xyz or .whatever.
If I recall correctly, the term "google" and "youtube" were among the most "googled" terms. People are too lazy to type out the URL anyway.
They're not just lazy; many people don't _understand_ what URLs are. They just navigate the web by googling for site names or whatever content they want.
And some are stuck in this way... I have attempted to train/show/explain how the URL bar is also the same as the search field on google.com.... even once they understood, the response was often - "Well, I don't care - this is how I do it and this is how I like to do it"
/pulls out hair
/pulls out hair
If it works, no matter how ridiculous, it's best just to let it be.
https://xkcd.com/763/
https://xkcd.com/763/
Ha! I know very well what a URL is, but I still navigate the web by googling.
I do too, but that's mostly because my address bar googles every string I type as I'm typing it.
ha. like my dad
We've basically never left the days of AOL keywords.
To a vast number of people, Google is the Internet. They don't know or care to know what a domain name is; they know the name YouTube and know that they type it into Google and then click the link at the top. That's why short domain names are not as important as unique brand names.
More anecdotes for future economics courses to point to for explaining what happens when you try to tightly restrict what people are aloud to invest in. Just like the dozens of empty megalopolises of high end condos over there.
What happened to the new TLDs? Is there not interest or not user understanding? I remember explaining them years ago to some end users who objected to the idea; they wanted to hold onto the familiar ".com", even though it did nothing for them.
I thought they would greatly increase supply of popular second-level domains. Also, I thought large organizations who could afford it would setup their own TLDs and leave behind registrars and the associated issues. For example, why doesn't IBM use .ibm instead of ibm.com?
But it looks like the vast majority still want only .com.
I thought they would greatly increase supply of popular second-level domains. Also, I thought large organizations who could afford it would setup their own TLDs and leave behind registrars and the associated issues. For example, why doesn't IBM use .ibm instead of ibm.com?
But it looks like the vast majority still want only .com.
Many of the new TLDs are prohibitively expensive for individuals or SMEs. For example .club is nearly €6000 per year through Gandi versus €20 for a .org or €7 for .org.uk
The prices may drop in future to try to stimulate demand but right now they're mostly hilarious.
The prices may drop in future to try to stimulate demand but right now they're mostly hilarious.
I own a bunch of short domain names that I picked up back in 2007 when they were dropped. It was a fun hobby at the time looking through the list of new available names trying to find useful ones. In the process I picked up a bunch of short names like nzdk.com which I use for various projects. In the last few month I have been getting around 20 offers a week for these. The prices have become crazy.
I wonder if this is specific to .com or if short domains in other TLDs are becoming of value.
I bought bo.gg a while back just because it was so short and easy to remember, I figured it would be useful. And just yesterday I got an email from what seemed to be a very serious Chinese buyer offering $800.
I bought bo.gg a while back just because it was so short and easy to remember, I figured it would be useful. And just yesterday I got an email from what seemed to be a very serious Chinese buyer offering $800.
Aren't there 1369 (37^2) 2 letter domain names? A-Z (case insensitive) 0-9, hyphen? Even if you restrict it to start with letter, no hyphen in last, that's still 936 two letter domain names.
So domain squatting is investing now? Good to know.
Cybersquatting is not a legitimate business and anyone who participates in it should feel bad.
Do you feel that buying property as an investment is a strikingly new business technique?
[deleted]
I can't help feeling domain names are too cheap, just raising the prices a little would wipe out many of the squatters.
where would be a good place to sell some of these domains?
A Chinese company is why I'm kelukelu.me instead of kelu.me :(
[deleted]
I suspect the china market is shifting away from having younger people "invest" in the real estate bubble and towards "investing" in domain names..
Oh the poor guys don't know the pour down of all the new TLDs probably...
Maybe that's why they are starting to open up the great firewall. Just to steal all that money once more.
Oh the poor guys don't know the pour down of all the new TLDs probably...
Maybe that's why they are starting to open up the great firewall. Just to steal all that money once more.