A Forgotten Adventure with a Telepathic Tribe(news.nationalgeographic.com)
news.nationalgeographic.com
A Forgotten Adventure with a Telepathic Tribe
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/11/amazon-encounter-explorer-photographer/
29 comments
Let's not forget that speaking/talking is telepathy, right people? Speech crosses all the boxes:
Yes, but the "real" telepathy is when you can picture, in your head, the exact tree I'm picturing in my head, without me doing anything to help you.
Sounds pretty sci-fi, until you read about recent brain to brain communication experiments.
Sounds pretty sci-fi, until you read about recent brain to brain communication experiments.
I don't think that's possible because the first person never really has a complete tree picture to begin with. Instead you have a while bunch of sub-impressions which your brain dynamically invents from old experiences as your attention wanders.
Even if you transfer all the input-requirements, the other person's procedural generator will give a different set of outputs to satisfy them.
Even if you transfer all the input-requirements, the other person's procedural generator will give a different set of outputs to satisfy them.
You're right, but those experiments are still pretty impressive.
I think one needs to only look as far as usage of gifs and emoji and Snapchat/Instagram to see how fast that will be adopted once the I/O devices improve.
Long-distance telepathy if you do it over a phone.
I think IMs on smartphones are closest we are to sci-fi long-range telepathic connection from practical standpoint though.
I think IMs on smartphones are closest we are to sci-fi long-range telepathic connection from practical standpoint though.
Reminds me of "The Realm of Rough Telepathy"[1]; a spoof of ICANN history by presenting the organization in the guise of an order of mages with secret rituals and cabbalistic rites, which fit surprisingly well with real proceedings and RFC reviews, etc.
[1]http://grimoire.computer/
[1]http://grimoire.computer/
I can't believe the claim, since telepathy has never been demonstrated- however! I think I have to admit that there isn't any law of physics that says telepathy is impossible, theoretically. It would certainly be possible over short distances if humans had specialized organs for transmitting and receiving electrical signals, like an electric eel does. Since we don't have that organ, the signals a human brain can produce are very weak, which is why they put electrodes right on your scalp and not a few inches away. If telepathy could occur, it would have to be in a very electrically quiet place like the Amazon. It could be that telepathy is real but just never tested in an electrically quiet enough environment. The modern world is shockingly noisy- cell phones, radio towers, the power grid, and wifi hubs all produce constant electrical noise. Even in the Amazon I'd say the probability that this is real is very very low, but hey, who knows.
If that was true there would be some record from the thousands and thousands of years of written history from before humans harnessed the electron.
That's a good point!
I would love for the species to develop Telepathy. Since I was a child I've dreamed of the day (sci-fi drove me there), and I feel that we inch closer and closer as the Internet grows by day ..
Here's an unpopular point of view. I believe we have telepathy already - but we repress it consciously or unconsciously for the simple reason that down that road lies madness. Let's say for example that people can telepath. How do you turn it on or off? Maybe you can't turn it off: that is the definition of insanity. You hear voices talking to you and they never shut up. Or, you have an argument with someone, but they are telepathic. When they leave the room, you still hear them shouting at you - the argument goes on and on even though physically you are no longer in the same place. Definition of insanity right there. Who would want that? No one really. Telepathic ability is repressed for good and logical reasons. Why would you want telepathy? So you can know what people are thinking without asking them? Wouldn't that be a huge invasion of privacy? Would you want people finding out your thoughts without your permission? Another nightmare scenario. If you think about it long enough - telepathy is a truly bad idea.
I think one avenue almost feasible today would be:
Electromyography on the larynx > silent speech recognition > transmission of the data through wireless network > speech synthesis > ouput audio to wireless earphone.
If you implant both ends you have something indistinguishable from (consensual) telepathy.
Electromyography on the larynx > silent speech recognition > transmission of the data through wireless network > speech synthesis > ouput audio to wireless earphone.
If you implant both ends you have something indistinguishable from (consensual) telepathy.
So just a couple "apt update && apt upgrade"'s away, and we're there ..
Which it no doubt will. The only question for me is whether it will use wires to route the signal into your brain directly, magnetically 'beam' it in (by inducing neuron activity), or sent chemically through additional specialized neurons grown on your brain for that purpose.
My father (and no doubt me at some point) has hearing aids that have bluetooth in them. He can answer the phone and talk on it without an additional earpiece. Cochlear implants can be augmented to use it[1]. So at some point understanding how to inject sound into your head will become so well understood it will simply be a matter of how much you're willing to spend.
[1] http://www.medel.com/us/bluetooth-wireless-connectivity-and-...
My father (and no doubt me at some point) has hearing aids that have bluetooth in them. He can answer the phone and talk on it without an additional earpiece. Cochlear implants can be augmented to use it[1]. So at some point understanding how to inject sound into your head will become so well understood it will simply be a matter of how much you're willing to spend.
[1] http://www.medel.com/us/bluetooth-wireless-connectivity-and-...
Why?
Telepathy seems like a nightmare or curse. Esp if it comes quickly. As in without millions of years of evolution to adapt socially to it.
Telepathy seems like a nightmare or curse. Esp if it comes quickly. As in without millions of years of evolution to adapt socially to it.
careful what you wish for, everyone has their dark side
And an exceptional front light side. I'm always amazed how most people give the best of themselves during casual social encounters. The big effort we do in social interactions is kind of an art, we're not so good in daily life with our close ones, simply because we can't maintain that effort for so long. Telepathy would ruin this, I guess.
It depends if there were some sort of control mechanism for just how much telepathy was 'allowed' - like, its not - imho - full mind-reading, but rather "selective understanding" from the target sides' point of view .. I wouldn't want to know everything, just a few things during actual real incidents. Therefore, there still has to be a line between individual choice and social sharing.
That truly is the beauty of thinking about it, and letting imagination temper itself with the banality of reality.
Like, for example, the experience of having watched the birth of the Internet, and seen it actually channel itself into 4chan, parish, et al., was .. yeah .. kinda enlightening.
If we Get Telepathic, its going to be useful to have gotten over such things. Just a hunch.
Like, for example, the experience of having watched the birth of the Internet, and seen it actually channel itself into 4chan, parish, et al., was .. yeah .. kinda enlightening.
If we Get Telepathic, its going to be useful to have gotten over such things. Just a hunch.
Our thoughts, as we experience them, are usually in a form of an inner monologue, and very much like talking it's always in some particular language. Based on that I'd suspect, if telepathy was possible, that it would still be very closely bound to the language that you use to verbalize your thoughts.
Not for everyone.
People who "think in language" tend to be more common, but there are "people who think in language" and people who just don't. And people in either camp tend to assume that that's just how everyone is, until they are shown different. But since the "think in language" camp is larger, it is a lot easier to go through life not ever realizing that there are people who are different, to the point that many people even refuse to belief that non-linguistic thinkers exist even when presented with examples, which leads to a great deal of misinformation being spread in discussions of psycholinguistics.
People who "think in language" tend to be more common, but there are "people who think in language" and people who just don't. And people in either camp tend to assume that that's just how everyone is, until they are shown different. But since the "think in language" camp is larger, it is a lot easier to go through life not ever realizing that there are people who are different, to the point that many people even refuse to belief that non-linguistic thinkers exist even when presented with examples, which leads to a great deal of misinformation being spread in discussions of psycholinguistics.
Your thoughts may always be in a language. I tend to have images more than words.
Saw/heard this in London - very well told story.
A lot of information can be conveyed with body language, context and emotion, to the point where it's difficult to distinguish from telepathy. Most especially with folks who've spent a great deal of time together.
I'm maybe not the only one who's experienced bits of 'beaming' with a long time friend or partner?
Perhaps "I have a pretty good idea of what X is thinking" is softer language than "I'm reading X's mind", but I can see how the experience of telepathy is not greatly distant from something that's normal for many people.
I'm maybe not the only one who's experienced bits of 'beaming' with a long time friend or partner?
Perhaps "I have a pretty good idea of what X is thinking" is softer language than "I'm reading X's mind", but I can see how the experience of telepathy is not greatly distant from something that's normal for many people.
When I was in high school, my AP Chem class only had a handful of people in it. The chemistry teacher was a pretty awesome laid-back guy, and so in the month of school left after the AP test but before the end of the school year, we pretty much used all our class time to play pinochle.
After a few weeks of playing with the same partner, you can pretty much know what they have in their hand just by the way they play.
After a few weeks of playing with the same partner, you can pretty much know what they have in their hand just by the way they play.
As a note, I've seen the encounter twice now here in Manhattan - it's absolutely fantastic and I can't rave about it enough. They used a lot of cool sound trickery, mostly with a Sennheiser Neumann KU 100 and some well placed parabolics. Unfortunately it's no longer on broadway. http://theencounterbroadway.com/index.php#home-content