Apple Is Looking for Linux Kernel Developers(phoronix.com)
phoronix.com
Apple Is Looking for Linux Kernel Developers
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Apple-Hiring-For-Linux-Kernel
67 comments
I'm surprised I haven't seen Fuchsia mentioned... anywhere. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Fuchsia
yes i noticed that job posting and it is actually very close to where I live, I even thought about applying, then I'm not an apple fan and I don't appreciate the way Apple deals with OSS, so I stopped.
it's about chip validation and has nothing to do with MacOS etc, because it will be pretty unwise to use MacOS to check silicons.
it's about chip validation and has nothing to do with MacOS etc, because it will be pretty unwise to use MacOS to check silicons.
Finally throwing out Mach out of the window or something needed for something else?
Although maybe it's too hard to find "osx kernel developers" outside of Apple so they look for the next best thing. It may not be a sign of them switching to Linux.
I think for that sort of stuff, they'd put an ad for "Kernel Developer", and just ask for Linux (or BSD) experience.
This sort of ad seems to indicate they'd hire somebody to actually work on Linux stuff.
This sort of ad seems to indicate they'd hire somebody to actually work on Linux stuff.
Wouldn't it be cool if they are thinking about moving to the Linux kernel to reduce overhead?
Not if that means the end of I/O Kit as a relatively stable driver interface.
But YES PLEASE if it means we don't have to deal with endless new bugs introduced by their heinous QA of lately .. APFS, root logins, &etc.
I would expect that the wholesale change from Darwin to Linux would introduce an amazing number of new and awful bugs. It's not like their development processes will suddenly be fixed when it's been touched by Linux.
I believe Linux (the kernel) has one of the most productive, QA production lines out there. If Apple were to adopt the "Linux way", we may indeed see a change ..
On the other hand, it may work against us, having Apple involved in Linux things. I'm not sold either way - but I sit here, re-installing MacOS on two Macbook Pro's, both of which absolutely refuse to make a usable/safe disk image out of their own disks. This is such a frustrating conundrum, it feels like Solaris in the 90's. I can only hope something changes at Apple, or else I'm just going to wipe MacOS and put Linux on these machines. That is quite a watershed, imho.
On the other hand, it may work against us, having Apple involved in Linux things. I'm not sold either way - but I sit here, re-installing MacOS on two Macbook Pro's, both of which absolutely refuse to make a usable/safe disk image out of their own disks. This is such a frustrating conundrum, it feels like Solaris in the 90's. I can only hope something changes at Apple, or else I'm just going to wipe MacOS and put Linux on these machines. That is quite a watershed, imho.
Have you run a drive test? If you're having storage errors it could manifest itself in weird ways.
Yes, I've done it and Disk Utility doesn't think there's anything wrong. But yet, I've tried over and over to make a disk image - of different disks, even - and every single time I get the error "no usable disk image found". At this point, after having scoured the web for clues, I can only conclude: this is a bug in MacOS.
I'm now trying to do a full update to the latest release, and see if it works beyond that point - but if it doesn't, the good ol' tarball approach is all I've got left.
I think Apple has some QA issues.
I'm now trying to do a full update to the latest release, and see if it works beyond that point - but if it doesn't, the good ol' tarball approach is all I've got left.
I think Apple has some QA issues.
Does it have anything with kernel? I thought that those bugs are mostly userspace.
The one recent kernel bug I remember is poll returning early:
https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2016/10/11/poll-on-mac-10-12-is-...
https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2016/10/11/poll-on-mac-10-12-is-...
May be they want to write Linux drivers for their Macs? They did that for Windows.
They want ARM experience, presages some future Macs :P
And note that it's within Apple's silicon validation team.
Except the focus of both job ads is embedded/SoCs that sort of thing.
Not just Linux Kernel, but embedded Linux Kernel. If it was just Linux Kernel development, I would assume it was for cloud storage.
I know some places that consider storage appliances, even the big boy ones, to be 'embedded'.
Could it just be they’ve had people leave them? Their QA seems to indicate this is possible anyway.
Or their Apple Car project.
Bingo. Apple has a good amount of engineers working on Linux and QNX embedded devices. I think it's pretty clear at this point that they are still working on cars and that they are also integrating those cars with Apple maps. I think they want to kill two birds with one stone with Project Titan: get more map data and develop software for self-driving cars.
Texas and California; I wonder if that's a clue too. If so, it'd be very interesting, especially at a time when Waymo is now the only one left with a clean sheet. I wonder how far away Apple is from a product?
Embedded devices—what's the HomePod running?
Same thing most of their devices are ultimately running, now, some variation of iOS.
EDIT: https://twitter.com/stroughtonsmith/status/89096147427705651...
EDIT: https://twitter.com/stroughtonsmith/status/89096147427705651...
A very far fetched possibility would be that Macs will run iOS - no UNIX stuff exposed, everything signed and secure. An embedded SoC will run in secure space and expose Linux in a iOS terminal application so you can do all your development work - ssh, vim and whatnot there.
Kind of like WSL but instead main OS is completely locked down and instead of software emulation you get isolated hardware to run Linux.
Kind of like WSL but instead main OS is completely locked down and instead of software emulation you get isolated hardware to run Linux.
They already ship a perfectly good hypervisor with macOS that is able to run a Linux kernel (and is used by Docker for Mac and many other projects).
Secure lock down is not possible with hypervisor that allows you to run any OS. The idea would be to only run what Apple allows - a tailored Linux distro - and only on the coprocessor which is isolated from the fully locked down main OS.
Oh and by the way "perfectly good" is way too generous for the hypervisor macOS ships with, unless there have been recent drastic improvements..
Oh and by the way "perfectly good" is way too generous for the hypervisor macOS ships with, unless there have been recent drastic improvements..
What's wrong with exposing UNIX stuff? When I jailbroke my iPhone and ssh-ed into it, there were UNIX tools there. I'm not sure whether they are from iOS or from jailbreak.
Can’t see the point. I need my Unix tools, like git, ssh and wget etc to have full file system and network access. Having them run in a hypervisor adds overhead and complexity for no real benefit.
To enable iOS apps on the Mac, they only need to activate the iOS developer API with their existing OS - Darwin. AFAIK, iOS and macos share the same kernel, more or less
Just to be clearer, when you run iOS apps under the simulator, the code is compiled as x86 assembly and linked against an x86 version of the iOS framework. There's no emulation involved.
But that won't lock down the BSD API all macOS apps have access to.
Yeah, it’s worth pointing out that iOS already runs on the mac, as anybody who’s used the simulator knows.
Probably for custom networking or storage hardware. Apple is a major high tech corporation, and what OS runs their data centers? (Not MacOS)
IIRC some of their cloud storage is Google Cloud as well.
They're probably pushing into more vertical control there. Good guess.
They're probably pushing into more vertical control there. Good guess.
Yeah my first thought went to some new version of their Time Capsule product.
NetBSD, IIRC. (Which you might say is the "upstream" of Apple's Darwin in about the same way that Debian is the upstream of Ubuntu.)
Don't you mean freebsd?
That link does not say Apple is using NetBSD in the datacenter. It says that some of the userland tools in OS X come from NetBSD.
My response was just to counter the common misapprehension that macOS itself is built on a FreeBSD userland. It's NetBSD, and devices like the AirPort Extreme/Time Capsule use NetBSD directly. And, back when the iTunes Store was a WebObjects service, it was hosted on Xserves running a weird reverse-Darwin (i.e. a Darwin-shimmed userland atop a NetBSD kernel, because macOS itself wasn't yet performant enough to be a good server but they still needed WebObjects to run.)
These days, Apple's datacenters are running all sorts of things, including Darwin, Linux, Solaris, and AIX[1]. But the "Darwin" part is still essentially NetBSD, not FreeBSD.
[1] http://www.zdnet.com/article/tale-of-two-data-center-strateg...
These days, Apple's datacenters are running all sorts of things, including Darwin, Linux, Solaris, and AIX[1]. But the "Darwin" part is still essentially NetBSD, not FreeBSD.
[1] http://www.zdnet.com/article/tale-of-two-data-center-strateg...
> My response was just to counter the common misapprehension that macOS itself is built on a FreeBSD userland.
I don't think most people say that macOS is built on top of a FreeBSD userland. Most people rightly point out that there is a lot of FreeBSD code inside the macOS code base specifically the XNU kernel[1].
> But the "Darwin" part is still essentially NetBSD, not FreeBSD.
That's incorrect while there is NetBSD code in MacOS. Dismissing the FreeBSD code, the Mach code, the code Apple wrote and saying that Darwin is essentially NetBSD is extremely disingenuous[2].
[1]: https://github.com/apple/darwin-xnu/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=...
[2]: https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/Da...
I don't think most people say that macOS is built on top of a FreeBSD userland. Most people rightly point out that there is a lot of FreeBSD code inside the macOS code base specifically the XNU kernel[1].
> But the "Darwin" part is still essentially NetBSD, not FreeBSD.
That's incorrect while there is NetBSD code in MacOS. Dismissing the FreeBSD code, the Mach code, the code Apple wrote and saying that Darwin is essentially NetBSD is extremely disingenuous[2].
[1]: https://github.com/apple/darwin-xnu/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=...
[2]: https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/Da...
If you like open source, don't work for Apple.
I've seen multiple people stop all their open source contributions and communicating online after being hired by them. I assume they have very draconian NDAs.
I've seen multiple people stop all their open source contributions and communicating online after being hired by them. I assume they have very draconian NDAs.
From what I hear, at Apple you're not allowed to contribute to open source projects (unless it's part of your day job) even in your own time - in contrast to Google (from what I hear) and Facebook (personal experience) where you can but you must clear it with legal and it can't be related to your day job.
And how does it work in CA? AFAIU, there're laws which prevent such limitations in most cases. I.e. everything which is done on the person's time is their own choice.
It is hard to find something that can't somehow be considered to compete with Apple. And in CA you can be let go for no reason, so...
For example, I couldn't get approval to contribute patches to a gallery plugin for Wordpress that I was using for my personal blog, because you know, the Photos app is a gallery of photos.
I hope you quit after that. Working for a company so draconian and anti-society would drive me mad.
I stayed a few years for a few reasons, first because it is still a good company with a “real” product, and also because 99% of my time there was spent working on open-source (clang/llvm).
When I decided to quit, it was in part because of their open source policy.
There are tons of developers who not only don't care about writing open source software on the side, actually go home after working 8 hours a days on computers and decide not to do any code at all and spend time on other hobbies, with their family, etc.
Actually, going home my wife would be the one complaining about not being able to do what she wanted with the blog and asking me to fix it ;)
Can anyone else please confirm for apple.
Nobody is going to confirm it in any way you’ll find acceptable (like verifiable list of names/contributions), for one obvious reason: Apple employees tend not to post identifiably in public because articles (like this one) try to extrapolate public knowledge with hilariously wrong guesses at the roadmap, and it creates risk that isn’t worth the trade offs for the employee.
Unless you happen to work on one of the open source projects they're involved with, I suppose. LLVM, Clang, Webkit etc.
Or CUPS or Darwin.
No major technology company open sources their Crown Jewels.
No major technology company open sources their Crown Jewels.
Apache Traffic Server
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
Note: Silicon validation engineer.
They probably use Linux as extra validation for their chips.
They probably use Linux as extra validation for their chips.
Apple is indeed hiring - e.g. https://jobs.apple.com/us/search?#&ss=Linux%20Driver%20and%2...
Most Apple SOCs boot Linux inside apple HQ to run tests. There are drivers for everything and it all works. Linux turns out to be a more convenient way to do validation and testing than iOS. Obviously this code is never released outside of apple.
Source: ex-applers
Source: ex-applers
Do you mean Darwin? Or is there an actual Linux/non-BSD install?
I’ve also heard that this is the case. Linux means Linux; Darwin is an entirely different operating system, though it uses some BSD user land.
If you have, say, a farm of little ARM-driven devices that you use as test harnesses for chips or other hardware, it isn't necessarily cheaper to port whatever variation of xnu to this particular hardware than to use an existing port of Linux and hire some folks who can help with the low level I/O bits. There might even be Linux in your world because, e.g. an acquired company built something on it that hasn't been worth porting.
Or any of a ton of other possibilities.
Having an OS doesn't mean you have to use (variations of) it for everything, especially if the new use you're thinking about is far from your usual.