The box problem that baffled the boffins(theguardian.com)
theguardian.com
The box problem that baffled the boffins
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/sep/30/did-you-solve-it-the-box-problem-that-baffled-the-boffins
13 comments
It’s good intuition and explanation. I hadn’t heard of the problem before and looked at your comment before the article and the problem seemed trivial.
Andrew will open boxes in second and third row before the other player, so in the case of the illustration he will open 2/3rds of the boxes first. If the columns are longer than the rows, Andrew would start to lose.
Andrew will open boxes in second and third row before the other player, so in the case of the illustration he will open 2/3rds of the boxes first. If the columns are longer than the rows, Andrew would start to lose.
One of those rare cases where Gemini Advanced outsmarts o1-preview. Gemini understood the importance of wasted turns when one player opens a box already checked by the other, and understood that this effect would penalize Barbara more than Andrew.
But of course these models are just stochastic parrots locked in a Chinese room. They don't "understand" anything, so never mind, nothing to see here.
But of course these models are just stochastic parrots locked in a Chinese room. They don't "understand" anything, so never mind, nothing to see here.
geocrasher(4)
The rows and columns thing is just a less perfect, but still useful, way for Andrew to front run Barbara's choices more often than the reverse happens.