A crypto founder faked his death. We found him alive at his dad's house(sfstandard.com)
sfstandard.com
A crypto founder faked his death. We found him alive at his dad's house
https://sfstandard.com/2025/05/08/jeffy-yu-zerebro-fake-death/
138 comments
I remember being called to a dinner which was paid for (figures). A couple well-dressed but fashionable guys tried to sell a crypto that ask you play a mobile game or something to earn coins which can be converted into real crypto? or something like that. There were a couple people at the dinner I know being constantly fallen into this kind of traps, including MLM, despite their success in their businesses. Well, the dinner was good at least and I found them kind of entertaining in a mentally-ill way.
Let me guess, Axie Infinity?
It is indeed MLM at its worst, because in this case you don't even walk away with any useless (but at least tangible) goods.
It is indeed MLM at its worst, because in this case you don't even walk away with any useless (but at least tangible) goods.
Axie Infinity nearly drove my old coworker insane. He was convinced that it was the best economic uplift for people in the Philippines in decades. He had hired a team of 20 Filipinos to "farm" axies for him, paying pennies a day. Needless to say when Axie got hacked in 2022, he quickly stopped posting about it in the work slack.
> despite their success in their businesses
It's interesting how often business success gets mistaken for general wisdom or street smarts. Just because someone built a profitable company doesn’t mean they’re immune to being naive or that their success wasn’t largely due to timing or luck. It’s a different skill set entirely to spot scams, especially the ones that are dressed up in just enough buzzwords to sound legit. Some people are great at one thing but totally blind in other areas of life.
It's interesting how often business success gets mistaken for general wisdom or street smarts. Just because someone built a profitable company doesn’t mean they’re immune to being naive or that their success wasn’t largely due to timing or luck. It’s a different skill set entirely to spot scams, especially the ones that are dressed up in just enough buzzwords to sound legit. Some people are great at one thing but totally blind in other areas of life.
real crypto
I had a look at the community feed thingy on the right-hand side of https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/zerebro/, oh boy, never have I seen such a high concentration of scammers scamming each other in broad daylight. You'll find real gems like "Amazon" (shown as "Amazon" with Amazon logo, with the handle @nk1dfpb3fmjp conveniently hidden) announcing "the next era of digital transactions with the Amazon Token (AMZ), a blockchain-based asset designed to revolutionize e-commerce". Highly amusing, 10/10.
You must be new to crypto. This is standard operating procedure. These scammers are everywhere and they're hard to miss.
It's common to have fake or hacked youtube channels - often with hundreds of thousands of subscribers - branded as official channels, featuring deepfake videos and livestreams from tech ceos announcing these scam coins. There are fake comments under tech videos and fake accounts on twitter discussing scam coins.
It's common to have fake or hacked youtube channels - often with hundreds of thousands of subscribers - branded as official channels, featuring deepfake videos and livestreams from tech ceos announcing these scam coins. There are fake comments under tech videos and fake accounts on twitter discussing scam coins.
> It's common to have fake or hacked youtube channels ... branded as official channels ... featuring deepfake videos and livestreams from tech ceos announcing these scam coins.
Inexplicably, X runs $Grok ads featuring fake Musk.
Inexplicably, X runs $Grok ads featuring fake Musk.
I don't know what I expected, but I sure was not ready for my eyes to bleed this much at this hour:
> CoinMarketCap is dropping diamonds, fam! This airdrop is rugproof, ready to pump. Stack free bags!
> CoinMarketCap is dropping diamonds, fam! This airdrop is rugproof, ready to pump. Stack free bags!
You missed the URL for that one:
> $ZEREBRO penispillreviews.com And yeah, that looks like an actual crypto website. This is bizarre. It's like they're rolling with the "we're totally a scam" angle.
> $ZEREBRO penispillreviews.com And yeah, that looks like an actual crypto website. This is bizarre. It's like they're rolling with the "we're totally a scam" angle.
I remember when I was working at this place making concrete walls our foreman was talking about getting into a MLM scheme, he said he knew it was MLM but because he was getting in early he would be one of the big earners.
So some suckers will fall harder if they know you're a scam, my theory.
So some suckers will fall harder if they know you're a scam, my theory.
That's 100% legit. Source: I *am* Amazon.
In all seriousness, when the topic of crypto is brought up, I feel angry at myself.
Back at the peak of crypto-hype, and NFT mania i had the gut feeling that this is all bullshit — even though I couldn't put my finger on why.
(And do you remember ICOs?? What was wrong with us??!!)
But seeing a lot of people around me — who are much more knowledgeable, and had way more experience and, most importantly, whose opinions I respected — embrace it, made me feel ashamed of myself for not being able to see the "obvious" value of crypto.
And while I didn't advocate for Blockchain, I feel that I wasn't vocal enough about its drawbacks.
Seeing now that the US government itself getting involved is very worrisome, and sad.
In all seriousness, when the topic of crypto is brought up, I feel angry at myself.
Back at the peak of crypto-hype, and NFT mania i had the gut feeling that this is all bullshit — even though I couldn't put my finger on why.
(And do you remember ICOs?? What was wrong with us??!!)
But seeing a lot of people around me — who are much more knowledgeable, and had way more experience and, most importantly, whose opinions I respected — embrace it, made me feel ashamed of myself for not being able to see the "obvious" value of crypto.
And while I didn't advocate for Blockchain, I feel that I wasn't vocal enough about its drawbacks.
Seeing now that the US government itself getting involved is very worrisome, and sad.
> Seeing now that the US government itself getting involved is very worrisome, and sad.
One reason this is worrisome is that crypto mining is 40% in the US and 45% between authoritarian countries of Russia, China, and North Korea. If they collaborate and get another 5% of the mining capacity, then they can destroy all of the value wrapped up in a given crypto. Wait until the US invests significant funds then make the investment worthless. Seems like US adversaries would be happy to invest many billions of dollars to have financial control of the US. And they only need the threat. The US investing in crypto cedes financial control of US currency to outside actors. And now they have the dipshit helping too.
One reason this is worrisome is that crypto mining is 40% in the US and 45% between authoritarian countries of Russia, China, and North Korea. If they collaborate and get another 5% of the mining capacity, then they can destroy all of the value wrapped up in a given crypto. Wait until the US invests significant funds then make the investment worthless. Seems like US adversaries would be happy to invest many billions of dollars to have financial control of the US. And they only need the threat. The US investing in crypto cedes financial control of US currency to outside actors. And now they have the dipshit helping too.
How do these scammers generate such big market caps for their coins? Offloading $1.4MM is a huge sum of money, more than 99.9% of people in the world would ever see at once.
Market cap doesn't equal what people have purchased.
See this classic from 2015:
https://medium.com/signal-v-noise/press-release-basecamp-val...
See this classic from 2015:
https://medium.com/signal-v-noise/press-release-basecamp-val...
In order to determine the valuation of companies, Bhatnagar typically applies the following formula: [(Twitter followers x Facebook fans) + (# of employees x 1000)] x (total likes + daily page views) + (monthly burn rate x Google’s stock price)-squared and then doubles if it they’re mobile first or if the CEO has run a business into the ground before.
I remember this one! Already 10 years ago, wow.
Wash trades mostly, then it is just a matter of finding some suckers to bite before you pull the rug.
$1.4M is a lot to you or me, but in the world of big money it is pocket change.
$1.4M is a lot to you or me, but in the world of big money it is pocket change.
How do wash trades work in a liquidity pool derived coin? Seems like the only way to boost the coin value is to put more 'real' coins into the LP and dump before someone else does after the pump attracts more suckers.
You do need to put cash in, sometimes quite a bit--so when you see that someone ran away with $1.4M be skeptical because at least some of the money they stole was their own.
To calculate market cap, you take the most recent trade and multiply it by the total number of coins/shares/etc that exist. Since the number of coins is decided by the coin's creator, all they need to do is sell a single coin for a single cent to get whatever market cap they want.
Furthermore, scammers often do "wash trades" where they set up two accounts and have one purchase from the other, for whatever price they feel like. So now they're making up both of the numbers that get multiplied to determine the market cap.
Furthermore, scammers often do "wash trades" where they set up two accounts and have one purchase from the other, for whatever price they feel like. So now they're making up both of the numbers that get multiplied to determine the market cap.
> How do these scammers generate such big market caps for their coins?
Faking one's own death, evidently.
Faking one's own death, evidently.
Market cap is essentially meaningless as it can be computed after 1 transaction which tells you nothing what price will be at any significant volume.
How... how did he think this was going to turn out? You fake your death, then run to mommy & daddy's house, and hope no one finds you? And just keep the cash?
Criminals, by and large, are stupid. They don't think it through. They just do stuff.
Most people who worry about silly little details such as "consequences" don't go into crime.
Most people who worry about silly little details such as "consequences" don't go into crime.
Criminals that are caught are stupid.
Survivorship bias because you can only observe the ones that are caught. I'm sure plenty of criminals have successfully faked their deaths.
Survivorship bias because you can only observe the ones that are caught. I'm sure plenty of criminals have successfully faked their deaths.
Lots of criminals that are smart get caught, because even smart people fuck up sometime. When some smart guy fucks up at his e-commerce site probably there just has to be a code rollback and maybe a talking to, if a smart criminal fucks up it's probably the cops come calling.
A cop once told me "Criminals almost always get caught because of probability. The vast majority of criminals don't commit just one crime, so chances are, they will eventually get caught. To never get caught, they have to get lucky every time. I only need to get lucky once."
You met a cop who actually catches criminals? Joking aside, probability works both ways and if the police don't actually do anything about crime, low level theft etc then those criminals will never get caught.
you don't do anything about low level theft because you will catch those criminals in the act at some point, rather than investigating after the fact which takes lots of resources, and then the system will take into account that most criminals have committed many crimes before being caught.
Doubt it is plenty. Because it either means you need to fly under the radar for the rest of your life (never cross borders, never be stopped, never use a bank account etc) or you need to manage to create a new identity which in itself is not very easy.
I don’t think anyone has a lot of experience faking their own death. How good at you at doing anything really complicated for the first time?
> Criminals, by and large, are stupid. They don't think it through. They just do stuff.
I guess the typical reply is that we mostly know about the stupid ones who get caught. But it would depend on the crime types, I guess. With some crimes, if the person is really meticulous and clever, chances are also they probably managed to make their business legitimate, like they just become a politician, and get their gains from lobbying and writing "books" instead of running cryptocoin scams.
I guess the typical reply is that we mostly know about the stupid ones who get caught. But it would depend on the crime types, I guess. With some crimes, if the person is really meticulous and clever, chances are also they probably managed to make their business legitimate, like they just become a politician, and get their gains from lobbying and writing "books" instead of running cryptocoin scams.
Jacques Philippa, a member of the SS, spent 29 years in the attic of his parents after the second world war to escape his death penalty. He was only found out because his mother died and elderly father could no longer take care of him.
It seems the main difference is that Philippa spent most of this timed confined to the attic rather than just walk around outside assuming no one would find him. Or trading his crypto assuming no one would notice.
Kind of an amazing story by the way, but not many resources available about it in English. But for those who can speak Dutch there's e.g. https://meitotmei.nl/zoldernazi-jacques-philippa-begon-zijn-... or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQceZ5O2oog
It seems the main difference is that Philippa spent most of this timed confined to the attic rather than just walk around outside assuming no one would find him. Or trading his crypto assuming no one would notice.
Kind of an amazing story by the way, but not many resources available about it in English. But for those who can speak Dutch there's e.g. https://meitotmei.nl/zoldernazi-jacques-philippa-begon-zijn-... or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQceZ5O2oog
Not every crime is planned to the last detail. We had a guy in our village who tried to rob a bank and got arrested by the bank's employees.
There's not planning a crime to the last detail, then there's faking your death without even thinking about how you're going to keep people from finding out that you're not dead.
Jeffy's story is a cautionary tale for our times - apparently thus: young talented programmer makes something that hits the zeitgeist but quickly unravels as the lure of riches of corrupts.
Zerebro was building an AI agent framework (+ the obligatory coin) and also released AI-generated music. The music is lowest common denominator AI pop with cringe lyrics [1] but at one point achieved a respectable ~40k monthly listeners on Spotify.
Jeffy hit the crypto podcast scene (see his Blocmates interview [2]) and comes across as quite earnest, but there was a lot of hype too, for sure.
One thing that these thread comments are maybe overlooking is that Jeffy may have been genuinely frightened of being harmed, like kidnapped. Hence the fake death. Crypto kidnappings are more prevalent in Europe, so maybe they're going to take off in the USA now too ...
[1] https://youtu.be/5JTgWQq0who?feature=shared
[2] https://youtu.be/A-_cd7Ze8mE?feature=shared
The lyrics to the music video betray a very shallow copycat misogyny.
Zerebro was building an AI agent framework (+ the obligatory coin) and also released AI-generated music. The music is lowest common denominator AI pop with cringe lyrics [1] but at one point achieved a respectable ~40k monthly listeners on Spotify.
Jeffy hit the crypto podcast scene (see his Blocmates interview [2]) and comes across as quite earnest, but there was a lot of hype too, for sure.
One thing that these thread comments are maybe overlooking is that Jeffy may have been genuinely frightened of being harmed, like kidnapped. Hence the fake death. Crypto kidnappings are more prevalent in Europe, so maybe they're going to take off in the USA now too ...
[1] https://youtu.be/5JTgWQq0who?feature=shared
[2] https://youtu.be/A-_cd7Ze8mE?feature=shared
The lyrics to the music video betray a very shallow copycat misogyny.
[flagged]
Ok, but please don't post unsubstantive comments to Hacker News.
We want curious conversation here. That can only happen when people say new things. Generic denunciations like what you posted here not only are nothing new, they're as repetitive as it gets.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
We want curious conversation here. That can only happen when people say new things. Generic denunciations like what you posted here not only are nothing new, they're as repetitive as it gets.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Not sure if all crypto is a scam necessarily, but sure that world is chock full of scammers trying to out-scam each other.
And if you give the scammers a platform that's not useful for anything else than building endless variations of memecoins and productless fake-tech penny stocks, what is the expected output?
Not sure if all crypto is a scam necessarily, but sure that world is chock full of scammers trying to out-scam each other.
Even BTC and ETH are shady. ETH should have been classified as security. BTC is an environmental disaster and centralized by a few large miners.
I don't think that it's all a scam, but I do think that it gives scammers a vehicle to con people without oversight or regulation. They also end up with "real" money which can be spent.
[flagged]
Ok, but please don't post unsubstantive comments to Hacker News. We want curious conversation here.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
You can keep telling yourself that, but there's enough utility and momentum behind it that it is not going anywhere. I'm saying this as a person with no stake in the matter, just observing from the sidelines.
Bernie Madoff's investments had a lot of utility and momentum for decades, too.
This is true but his records were well hidden, and the Bitcoin ledger is public.
Nothing in the Bitcoin ledger will tell you when someone's doing wash trading to manipulate the price.
Wash trading still happens in the NYSE, despite being illegal.
Interesting point about wash trading being somewhat untraceable. How about a coin that connects a hash whatever to each chunk of the token as it moves around so every coin has a backstory written into the blockchain. And that sounds like current fiat banking.
What is the utility behind it? I don't see people using to actually do any transactions because of the volatility and fluctuating transaction fees. Scams can have momentum behind them
There are people who use crypto for transactions. Stablecoins are stable and for some people the fees are far lower than any alternatives.
I'm not much aware of this type of use case, but is that really the future of crypto? Stablecoins for countries hit by sanctions, etc.?
True fiscal self-sovereignty. Albeit quite volatile.
You can't have this if you are a citizen of any country
Again, I'm going to mention that I'm looking at this from the sidelines.
I would argue that people make more purchases with Bitcoin than they do with gold.
I would argue that people make more purchases with Bitcoin than they do with gold.
Gold is similarly worthless as a currency. Which is why we don't use it as one any more.
It has plenty of utility, though. Open up any electronic device.
It has plenty of utility, though. Open up any electronic device.
Ditto baseball cards.
You can't send baseball cards instantly across the world and you have no guarantee of their authenticity.
You can sell ownership across the world instantly, and you can use a centralized authority for authenticity and grading. Done. All for less cost than crypto and without enabling DPRK to steal your card with no recourse.
This is exactly what happened with gold, and then people realized that basing money on gold was stupid, so now we have the system we have today. Cryptofools are two financial revolutions behind modernity.
This is exactly what happened with gold, and then people realized that basing money on gold was stupid, so now we have the system we have today. Cryptofools are two financial revolutions behind modernity.
I hear what you are saying and you're putting an awful lot of trust in that centralized authority.
We used to back our money with precious metals, but no longer do so. The dollar is now backed by aircraft carriers, jets, and military might.
We used to back our money with precious metals, but no longer do so. The dollar is now backed by aircraft carriers, jets, and military might.
> you're putting an awful lot of trust in that centralized authority.
No, I'm putting my trust in the rule of law.
> The dollar is now backed by aircraft carriers, jets, and military might.
It is mainly backed by trust in government monetary policy. Otherwise, what is the GBP backed by? The Royal Navy isn't what it used to be.
No, I'm putting my trust in the rule of law.
> The dollar is now backed by aircraft carriers, jets, and military might.
It is mainly backed by trust in government monetary policy. Otherwise, what is the GBP backed by? The Royal Navy isn't what it used to be.
Really? Seems more like the scams that keep it going? What's the utility that is keeping it going?
the dynamics of the crypto market seem to push non scammers out.
im not sure whether this is gresham's law or the dynamics of a lemon market in action or what though.
im not sure whether this is gresham's law or the dynamics of a lemon market in action or what though.
the dynamics of the crypto market seem to push non scammers out.
Somehow yes, and it's quite sad.
The blockchain technology itself is a marvel and the safety/security properties of properly decentralized systems are unmatched. The whole financial world would be better written using blockchain/smart contracts, same goes for voting/governance, etc.
But these scammers. So many of them... Easy to smell though, but the problem we need to fix is these scammers get most of the online traction/attention, taking it from truer builders.
The blockchain technology itself is a marvel and the safety/security properties of properly decentralized systems are unmatched. The whole financial world would be better written using blockchain/smart contracts, same goes for voting/governance, etc.
But these scammers. So many of them... Easy to smell though, but the problem we need to fix is these scammers get most of the online traction/attention, taking it from truer builders.
>The whole financial world would be better written using blockchain/smart contracts, same goes for voting/governance, etc.
Citation needed. Governance and finance absolutely need human judgment recovery edge cases such as "My house burnt down containing my ID (keys) and I need access to my bank account to rebuild it"
Citation needed. Governance and finance absolutely need human judgment recovery edge cases such as "My house burnt down containing my ID (keys) and I need access to my bank account to rebuild it"
Right. All of these "finance and government would be so much better with smart contracts" suggestions seem predicated on the idea that human beings can design a system correctly on the first attempt and deploy an immutable version of that system they can then run independently forever without any bugs or exploits that need to be fixed in the future.
Human beings cannot do that.
Human beings cannot do that.
Good point.
It seems the common approach now is to make a v2/v3/etc. of your protocol and let your own users migrate. Previous versions will still run forever, but your frontend can push migration paths.
It seems the common approach now is to make a v2/v3/etc. of your protocol and let your own users migrate. Previous versions will still run forever, but your frontend can push migration paths.
Social recovery for smart accounts covers your use case
Unlikely in practice.
"My house burned down and inside was my spouse, who was my reco ery contact"
"My recovery contact died / isn't speaking to me / is backpacking in the Himalayas"
The problem isn't technical. It isn't a formal mathematical problem. It's that the real world is messy.
There are plenty of other classes of problems too. "This person committed a crime and their assets need to be seized", etc.
"My house burned down and inside was my spouse, who was my reco ery contact"
"My recovery contact died / isn't speaking to me / is backpacking in the Himalayas"
The problem isn't technical. It isn't a formal mathematical problem. It's that the real world is messy.
There are plenty of other classes of problems too. "This person committed a crime and their assets need to be seized", etc.
>The blockchain technology itself is a marvel and the safety/security properties of properly decentralized systems are unmatched. The whole financial world would be better written using blockchain/smart contracts, same goes for voting/governance, etc.
No, blockchain really isn't all that amazing. Blockchain is useful when you need something decentralized, immutable, and trustless. That trustless bit is the important part, there are existing solutions for decentralized immutable ledgers that work far better than blockchains and require far less compute power. And it turns out that the vast majority of human and business interactions and transactions are actually based on varying levels of trust.
And that's before you get into blockchain-specific issues like the Oracle Problem.
No, blockchain really isn't all that amazing. Blockchain is useful when you need something decentralized, immutable, and trustless. That trustless bit is the important part, there are existing solutions for decentralized immutable ledgers that work far better than blockchains and require far less compute power. And it turns out that the vast majority of human and business interactions and transactions are actually based on varying levels of trust.
And that's before you get into blockchain-specific issues like the Oracle Problem.
Most important property of blockchains is verifiable transparency. That is a huge deal and yes, most financial and government systems would be much better for people if they were built with that type of verifiable transparency.
Decentralization is important but isn't as important. There are many successful chains that aren't decentralized at all and are quite useful.
Most top/real projects in blockchains aren't immutable. Pretty much everything is upgradable/changeable, including blockchains themselves.
Trustless - even this part isn' true for most blockchain systems. They all contain various levels of trusting different entities.
It is the transparency and verifiability that is the key idea and most important improvement that blockchains bring.
Decentralization is important but isn't as important. There are many successful chains that aren't decentralized at all and are quite useful.
Most top/real projects in blockchains aren't immutable. Pretty much everything is upgradable/changeable, including blockchains themselves.
Trustless - even this part isn' true for most blockchain systems. They all contain various levels of trusting different entities.
It is the transparency and verifiability that is the key idea and most important improvement that blockchains bring.
>It is the transparency and verifiability that is the key idea and most important improvement that blockchains bring.
You can have transparency and verifiability without blockchain, so long as you trust the parties publishing the ledger. So once again, trustless is really the key part to blockchain.
You can have transparency and verifiability without blockchain, so long as you trust the parties publishing the ledger. So once again, trustless is really the key part to blockchain.
> Most top/real projects in blockchains aren't immutable. Pretty much everything is upgradable/changeable, including blockchains themselves.
> Trustless - even this part isn' true for most blockchain systems.
Blockchains are immutable, trustless, permissionless. Otherwise it's called a database.
> Trustless - even this part isn' true for most blockchain systems.
Blockchains are immutable, trustless, permissionless. Otherwise it's called a database.
Spoke to some people working at big banks: They say trust, or rather lack thereof, _between_ banks is a key issue. Blockchains solve that.
No, they don't. Bank networks are fundamentally permissioned, only authorized entities are allowed to participate. Verifiability is a political/legal decision between these entities, not a technical limitation of existing systems.
Somehow? The only objective value from crypto is anonymity. It only serves to incentivize shady behavior.
I would say most current blockchains are pretty bad at privacy. Look at what onchain sleuths do.
Rather, blockchains enable anyone to provably check the state of the database. Your fintech app logs you out. No proof, and frustrating customer service hell for days/weeks/months.
Rather, blockchains enable anyone to provably check the state of the database. Your fintech app logs you out. No proof, and frustrating customer service hell for days/weeks/months.
> The whole financial world would be better written using blockchain/smart contracts, same goes for voting/governance, etc.
Eh? I thought blockchain didn't scale? As far as I can see blockchain swaps trust in banking institutions ( not to simply make up numbers in their banking systems ) - to trust in a majority based voting system where you don't know the people involved and you just hope the bad guys don't have a majority.
And the computational cost of running the distributed voting system - is many of orders magnitude higher than the computational costs of transactions in the we-trust-the-bank-model.
As for smart contracts - a quick google suggests that the cost of deploying a smart contract on Ethereum is 500 dollars - that's quite an overhead for the vast majority of financial transactions.
Eh? I thought blockchain didn't scale? As far as I can see blockchain swaps trust in banking institutions ( not to simply make up numbers in their banking systems ) - to trust in a majority based voting system where you don't know the people involved and you just hope the bad guys don't have a majority.
And the computational cost of running the distributed voting system - is many of orders magnitude higher than the computational costs of transactions in the we-trust-the-bank-model.
As for smart contracts - a quick google suggests that the cost of deploying a smart contract on Ethereum is 500 dollars - that's quite an overhead for the vast majority of financial transactions.
> The whole financial world would be better written using blockchain/smart contracts, same goes for voting/governance, etc.
These are all scams, too. No.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_DAO serves as a nice concrete example. "Code is law" fell apart as soon as the code resulted in a large enough bad outcome for enough people.
These are all scams, too. No.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_DAO serves as a nice concrete example. "Code is law" fell apart as soon as the code resulted in a large enough bad outcome for enough people.
Same as email I mean most of it is scams and ads so who cares about the tech or other people actually using it not like we are in a place tech literate enough to seperate technology and its users beyond the absolute surface.
Hekin upvoted kind stranger!
Hekin upvoted kind stranger!
Prove it!
Then the fiat money scam is no less. But no one is outraged...
Some good content for people who want to go down the Crypto Scammer rabbit hole:
Exit Scam (https://www.exitscam.show/) -- Crypto exchange founders rip off their customers so much that it has an actual name, as infamous a grift as the The Money Box or The Big Store. This podcast explores a QuadrigaCX and its founder's likely faked death, digging into a few other crypto scams for parallel examples.
Number Go Up by Zeke Faux (https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/711959/number-go-up...) -- this book, which reads as a cross between investigative reporting and New Journalism, tracks Sam Bankman-Fried's rise and fall, discusses the NFT grift, and explores the weird, wild world of stablecoins. Turtles all the way down on this stuff.
Exit Scam (https://www.exitscam.show/) -- Crypto exchange founders rip off their customers so much that it has an actual name, as infamous a grift as the The Money Box or The Big Store. This podcast explores a QuadrigaCX and its founder's likely faked death, digging into a few other crypto scams for parallel examples.
Number Go Up by Zeke Faux (https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/711959/number-go-up...) -- this book, which reads as a cross between investigative reporting and New Journalism, tracks Sam Bankman-Fried's rise and fall, discusses the NFT grift, and explores the weird, wild world of stablecoins. Turtles all the way down on this stuff.
I believe in crypto, I think it will even protect people online when done right.
And not everything is scam, there are good projects. That being said the behavior of people and organizations in crypto is poor and will slow adoption. I still regularly see major crypto ecosystems rug pull their own developers. They simply can’t help themselves.
And not everything is scam, there are good projects. That being said the behavior of people and organizations in crypto is poor and will slow adoption. I still regularly see major crypto ecosystems rug pull their own developers. They simply can’t help themselves.
> And not everything is scam, there are good projects.
I don't disagree, but at this point it has to be like 90% of crypto products are scams, and that number is still increasing. They're simply running out of people to scam. The 18-40 year old male demo can only lose so much on crypto and sports betting before they run out of money and credit. It's a giant ponzi that's losing it's legs. I'm sure it doesn't help that everything else is so expensive (housing), making these hail mary gambas more attractive, but the money will dry up regardless.
I don't disagree, but at this point it has to be like 90% of crypto products are scams, and that number is still increasing. They're simply running out of people to scam. The 18-40 year old male demo can only lose so much on crypto and sports betting before they run out of money and credit. It's a giant ponzi that's losing it's legs. I'm sure it doesn't help that everything else is so expensive (housing), making these hail mary gambas more attractive, but the money will dry up regardless.
We need to stop telling people they will make money with crypto. It is akin telling people they will make money with PostgreSQL. In both cases, if they build a great business, they may become successful and make some money. But looking at crypto through the lens of becoming rich quick is flowed.
Most investment in crypto is just gambling. It's all FOMO and snake oil. There are some stocks for which I'd say the same though (TSLA).
What are the good projects?
The ones that
* don't financially benefit their creators
* are not a copy-paste of an existing coin with some trivial changes
* don't financially benefit their creators
* are not a copy-paste of an existing coin with some trivial changes
> when done right.
Let me know when you see it done right.
Let me know when you see it done right.
Stellar and the United Nation joining forces to advance financial inclusion as a quick example. People can downvote me all they want due to biases, these projects do exist.
Has there been any results from it? The only online results I see are from January, when it was announced, and frankly I'm not even sure I understand what the methodology or goals are.
[deleted](1)
I'd be willing to bet that a) his parents aren't going anywhere and b) they will be glad he left, finally.
What caused the journalists at the SF Standard to pursue this particular story? This guy isn’t notable in any way, just another crypto bro as far as I can tell?
“I've been doxxed.” Pathetic.
Yet another crypto-bro attempting to dodge taxes. When will they learn?
> “You can see the PTSD in my eyes, right?” he said before telling this reporter to leave.
He was dead, with an obituary even and now back to being alive. Why the PTSD?! He should be rejoicing! /s
But I wonder, is faking your death on social media a crime? If he still paid taxes I guess he might be legally out of the woods, just based on the faking part, not related to the scamming thing.
He was dead, with an obituary even and now back to being alive. Why the PTSD?! He should be rejoicing! /s
But I wonder, is faking your death on social media a crime? If he still paid taxes I guess he might be legally out of the woods, just based on the faking part, not related to the scamming thing.
> But I wonder, is faking your death on social media a crime?
If it's for financial benefit, it's criminal fraud.
If it's for financial benefit, it's criminal fraud.
The memorial coin certainly seems like it would qualify if he benefited from it at all. My guess is he did and I'm a bit disappointed they don't seem to have looked much into that aspect nor mentioned asking him about it.
Agree, that would make sense. I can see if he was just some artist and doing it as performance art or to make some commentary a topic, he could defend it as such. But with cryptocurrency involved it looks like fraud.
jakupovic(2)
I hope he gets the help and relief he needs. In someways a brain with a penchant for software causes more trouble during mental health crises than one who doesn’t. Especially if they’re into crypto.
Software engineers are just normal people. Our brains are not "special." This (objectively incorrect) mental model of software devs is very harmful if you want to actually understand things going on around you.
People are attracted to things based on their personality traits. The average software engineer is not the same as the average person, because the average person is not attracted to software engineering.
In my observations, the average software engineer is more likely to be persnickety, caught up in small details, and obsessive than the average person. We're more likely to split hairs than most people would care to, and proper labeling and categorization is much more important to us than average person.
It's not that software engineers are somehow magical or special, it's that there is a selection bias to become a software engineer. It's extra not special, because the same thing happens for virtually any specialized field. There are famous stereotypes about the personalities of psychologists, for instance.
In my observations, the average software engineer is more likely to be persnickety, caught up in small details, and obsessive than the average person. We're more likely to split hairs than most people would care to, and proper labeling and categorization is much more important to us than average person.
It's not that software engineers are somehow magical or special, it's that there is a selection bias to become a software engineer. It's extra not special, because the same thing happens for virtually any specialized field. There are famous stereotypes about the personalities of psychologists, for instance.
> In my observations, the average software engineer is more likely to be persnickety, caught up in small details, and obsessive than the average person. We're more likely to split hairs than most people would care to, and proper labeling and categorization is much more important to us than average person.
It sounds like a fancy way of saying that people on the spectrum are more likely to become software engineers than some other arbitrary person.
It sounds like a fancy way of saying that people on the spectrum are more likely to become software engineers than some other arbitrary person.
It had occurred to me, but I didn't want to say it that way because I'm not a psychological professional and it seems out of my area of expertise to make that assumption based on my passive observations.
Nah. I assume you have friends inside and outside of software?
Software people are just different from the normal person. Way different. I couldn't put my two friend groups together.
Are they "special?" Maybe, maybe not.
Software people are just different from the normal person. Way different. I couldn't put my two friend groups together.
Are they "special?" Maybe, maybe not.
I have software friends and non-software friends. There is no particular correlation. This is some weird flavor of biological essentialism going on here.
No, we are not different then normal people.