CACM Practice section welcomes submissions(dl.acm.org)
dl.acm.org
CACM Practice section welcomes submissions
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3771297
4 comments
Wow! CACM always wanted to be a bridge between the computer science profession and professional developers. There were a lot of things that got in the way, not least the paywall. Now that that's gone the door is open to CACM Practice.
That's one reason they made ACM Queue [0], no?
[0] https://queue.acm.org/
[0] https://queue.acm.org/
I don’t think it was ever that successful. I can say years back I decided not to renew my ACM subscription because of a lot of little things like a really clueless Vint Cerf article and their unrelenting promotion of H-1B visas. I switched to the IEEE Computer Society because they were agnostic on the H-1B which was a position I could accept.
I’ve worked side-by-side with H1Bs and I can say the I probably felt the worst I ever felt when I wanted to tell a guy who was being abused by management that “your skills are really in demand you can go across the street and get a better job” but I couldn’t because that wasn’t true. I can accept giving out more green cards or some other programs but there is so much wrong with H-1B that if you are sticking up for computing practitioners I think it’s a problem to be enthusiastic.
I’ve worked side-by-side with H1Bs and I can say the I probably felt the worst I ever felt when I wanted to tell a guy who was being abused by management that “your skills are really in demand you can go across the street and get a better job” but I couldn’t because that wasn’t true. I can accept giving out more green cards or some other programs but there is so much wrong with H-1B that if you are sticking up for computing practitioners I think it’s a problem to be enthusiastic.
Although ACM Queue's audience is practitioners, author submissions to Queue are invite-only. CACM's new Practice section encourages submissions from outside academia.