Exploring JEPA for real-time speech translation(startpinch.com)
startpinch.com
Exploring JEPA for real-time speech translation
https://www.startpinch.com/research/en/jepa-encoder-translation/
9 comments
As somebody fluent in quite a few languages, language definitely affects even the way one thinks about things. Translation will always be imperfect because it's between different conceptual spaces, not some sort of mechanical replacement.
>There is no such things as parallel speech data
Which is why translation models such as the one from the article are no longer trained that way.
Which is why translation models such as the one from the article are no longer trained that way.
You've missed the point where it's already possible and you can demo it right there, on the website.
I've just tried the demo. It's impressive, but not that impressive. Cloned voice sounds nothing like my voice and also there are subtle errors in the translation.
I'm not sure if it works much better than STT -> LLM -> TTS pipeline would. Also, this is of course just a first impression and not serious testing.
I'm not sure if it works much better than STT -> LLM -> TTS pipeline would. Also, this is of course just a first impression and not serious testing.
Very cool work! We spend a lot of time thinking about "robust representations" in the video space.
Are there any alternative ideas to JEPA right now, when it comes to speech encoding that couples meaning and sound? Curious to learn more about journey from the problem space to solution space (JEPA).
For context, in our domain video-JEPA hasn't proved to be as helpful as one would have hoped. It's decent at high level semantics (e.g. action detection) but doesn't capture enough "detail" (intentionally so) to be used as a powerful enough encoder (or regularizer). Might be just because the research models are too small / haven't been trained on sufficiently large volumes of data, yet.
Are there any alternative ideas to JEPA right now, when it comes to speech encoding that couples meaning and sound? Curious to learn more about journey from the problem space to solution space (JEPA).
For context, in our domain video-JEPA hasn't proved to be as helpful as one would have hoped. It's decent at high level semantics (e.g. action detection) but doesn't capture enough "detail" (intentionally so) to be used as a powerful enough encoder (or regularizer). Might be just because the research models are too small / haven't been trained on sufficiently large volumes of data, yet.
Very cool. I learned something new about why EMA (exponential moving average) is needed:
> EMA-based training dynamics like JEPA’s don’t optimize any smooth mathematical function, yet they provably converge to useful, non-collapsed representations.
All the papers say EMA avoids “representation collapse” without justifying it. Didn’t realize there were any theoretical results here.
> EMA-based training dynamics like JEPA’s don’t optimize any smooth mathematical function, yet they provably converge to useful, non-collapsed representations.
All the papers say EMA avoids “representation collapse” without justifying it. Didn’t realize there were any theoretical results here.
Roughly, when you train a model to make its predictions align to its own predictions in some way, you create a scenario where the simplest "correct" solution is to output a single value under diverse inputs, aka representation collapse. This guarantees that your predicted representations agree, which is technically what you want it to do but it's degenerate.
EMA helps because it changes more slowly than the learning network which prevents rapid collapse by forcing the predictions to align to what a historical average would predict. This is a harder and more informative task because the model can't trivially output one value and have it match the EMA target so the model learns more useful representations.
EMA has a long history in deep learning (many GANs use it, TD-learning like DQN, many JEPA papers, etc.) so authors often omit defense of it due to over-familiarity or sometimes cargo culting. :)
EMA helps because it changes more slowly than the learning network which prevents rapid collapse by forcing the predictions to align to what a historical average would predict. This is a harder and more informative task because the model can't trivially output one value and have it match the EMA target so the model learns more useful representations.
EMA has a long history in deep learning (many GANs use it, TD-learning like DQN, many JEPA papers, etc.) so authors often omit defense of it due to over-familiarity or sometimes cargo culting. :)
I was just thinking of something along the same lines, but for something much sillier. Use self-supervised JEPA to make a color visualizer for audio -- synesthesia.
Was wondering if you guys have explored leJEPA and SIGReg?
There is no such things as parallel speech data. The idea that parallel text is a thing is dubious in the first place, like there's "translation tone" in Japanese that refers to the voice-of-text distinct to translated Western texts. The entire concept of translation between distinct human languages is a thing born out of practical necessity rather than something with a concrete theoretical basis.
The Babel fish in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is supposed to be mind-reading. They don't rely on spoken utterances at all, but they read the minds of creatures within its telepathic range and feed the language portions of it into its host's brain, thereby achieving zero-lag realtime translation. This may or may not mean the author Douglas Adams knew that general universal translation is impossible, but it makes the fictional fish not contradictory to the reality that zero-lag interpretation through audio is basically impossible.
You CAN probably do a parallel speech voice to voice if you're okay with something like 30s delay. But if you want a voice-to-voice no-pause zero-delay, I mean, people sometimes think as they speak, everyone can do, yet not everyone speaks languages with same word orders, you literally need a crystal ball that reads dices before they're even rolled.