Ideology is the direction you want to go, not necessarily the way you can go.
Its the same thing with immigration: My ideology is to help everyone and not think that every immigrant is bad. Doesn't mean that i have an issue punishing someone who comes and starts doing crime (after trying to help them nonetheless).
The ideology of right wing people is the other way: They assume all immmigrants are shit, hate them all, fear them but they still know 'the good immigrants' don't mind marring immigrants because these are the good execption immigrants.
The second attitude is the one which can spiral downhill inform of dehuminaztion and genocide.
Nonetheless its the same thing: if they can prove you watched it, the damage is small for you and because IP holders are splittered, and you didn't just watch content of one, its probably not worth it to sue you.
In germany its saver to illegally download through usenet because you don't upload and the cost a rights owner can make is only the cost of the product and not an aribrary number of (you puloaded it and created damage of x).
It doesn't make it legal at all, it just makes it no longer interesting for IP owners to sue you.
I'm curious when someone will do the right experiment in a way that some LLM on Cerebras will do the reasoning so well so big so fast, that it does something very novel
I'm following AI news and models for few years now and i have not read about your Grok2 controversy.
Nonetheless, i do not use grok and i do not try it out due to it being part of Musk.
I'm also not aware that Grok2 was communicated as the top model in any relevant timespan at all. Perhaps it just didn't deliver? Or a lot more people are not awaare of how to use it or boycot Musk.
After all he clearly doesn't care for any rules or laws it is probably a very high risk sending anything to grok.
She doesn't say she is an expert on trans-issues at all! She analyzed the studies and looked at data and stated that there is no real transpendemic but highlighed an statistical increased numbers in young woman without stating a clear opinion on this finding.
The climate change videos do the same thing. She evaluates these studies discusses them to clarify that for her, certain numbers are unspecific and she also is not coming to a clear conclusion in sense of climate change yes, no, bad, good.
She is for sure not an expert in all fields, but her way of discussing these topics are based on studies, numbers and is a good viewpoint.
The funding scam you mention is a reference of "these people get billions for particle research but the outcome for us as society is way to small"
I just ask to share a text editor and write down my questions. Its critical anyway because often then not its not always clear for tech questions what exactly i asked (linux command for example).
This blocks their screen too.
and yes we do know very soon if you look somewere else, take time or rephrase the question to get more time.
If you able to fake it, at that point you should just get th ejob anyway :P
There is a 'okayisch' way to stop everything (its the USA choice if the most powerful and richest country is no longer able or motivated to help around the globe despite the damage a country like the USA does around the globe, think co2, resources etc.) and there is the Musk/Trump way and no this is not okay at all. Its a breach of social contract, respect etc.
I also think people underestimate how much benefit a current LLM already has to researchers.
A lot of them have to do things on computers which has nothing to do with their expertise. Like coding a small tool for working their data, small tools crunching results, formatting text data, searching and finding the right materials.
A LLM which helps a scientist to code something in an hour instead of a week, makes this research A LOT faster.
And we know from another paper, that we have now so much data, you need to use systems to find the right information for you. The study estimated how much additionanl critical information a research paper missed.
Wireshark is a weird choice in my opinion because you know, why would i use Subtrace if i can use Wireshark?
and People who don't know how to use Wireshark want probably a better motivation to use Subtrace than 'its like wireshark' because there is a reason why they don't use it.
what do you think how long it takes to align all washing machine manufactures to make a 'Robot Washingmashine'? Also if its optimized for robots, you need a robot to use it.
The progress in ML/AI is so fast, we can easily skip this tedious assumption that we have to form our env for robots instead of teaching robots how to interact in our env.
and no a robot doesn't need to be efficient at all. A robot can do things 24/7. If i'm out of the house and a robot needs 4 hours to clean my kitchen and this doesn't cost me a lot besides of a little bit of energy, i could care very little how long it takes as long as it doesn't take too long.
I prototyped on the weekend and started out with 4o because i had a subscription running.
After an hour and a half assed working result, i put everything into claude and it made it significant better on the first try and i had not a subscription active with claude.
Its the same thing with immigration: My ideology is to help everyone and not think that every immigrant is bad. Doesn't mean that i have an issue punishing someone who comes and starts doing crime (after trying to help them nonetheless).
The ideology of right wing people is the other way: They assume all immmigrants are shit, hate them all, fear them but they still know 'the good immigrants' don't mind marring immigrants because these are the good execption immigrants.
The second attitude is the one which can spiral downhill inform of dehuminaztion and genocide.