Proof please. Besides FUD, can you show me actual Fiddler logs that say Microsoft takes any of your usage, adds your personal information to it and then saves it any more than what Android does? If not, please leave. Don't spread false information, you may think you're cool and hip for hating on Microsoft but lies always come back.
I'm amazed anything that's slightest pro-hillary gets so much attention but nobody talks about how she's paying $6M quarterly to manipulate votes on Reddit
Not to mention that its really easy to buy followers. There's at least one trending topic daily that is clearly bought (See who's tweeting it and they'll be xyz Fan and pqr lover bots)
Speaking as an end user- seeing that they provide no incentive to 'hackers' to help them instead of using this information otherwise, I'd say I'm inclined to not trust them.
I'm an expert in Vim but what strikes me as curious is that despite the seeming claim that emacs is better, I never see quick-start guides for emacs here.
Also, would somebody know who these gifs are created?
Us was on the genocidal pakistan side. Makes you wonder when would we stop rotating mistakes of the past. We're still supporting terrorists in Syria by calling them moderate rebels
Btw I'm curious, what do you guys think about the systematic efforts of her superpac to AstroTurf? Their records clearly show them spending millions on people posting comments on Facebook and reddit
Have you heard of testing? And have you heard of software verification? Microsoft research is far and away the leader with single person publishing multiple papers in the best conferences- POPL etc.
orrying about imaginary
Don't worry about imaginary future problesm. Its like me saying- my car is very complex and may crash, I will not drive it. This is how you hold technology back.
You're right. But I'd assume anyone using Linux (and arch at that) would be smart enough to know what's up. No OS is perfect but someone using Arch is just spreading FUD. Windows is a vector not because of security problems but because of its usage ratio. It just doesn't make economic sense to target any other OS plus the fact that hackers are not god, they need time to perfect their skills and they have it on Windows. Denouncing an OS despite the fact that it has stellar security on its own is basically bringing down people like you and I who are spending days and nights making things work for fine. Denouncing for valid reasons is fine. Security in Windows is not Microsoft's problem. They're trying their best, they're not all knowing. That loser on Arch should talk when Linux and macOS are completely impenetrable.