HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

Revolution1120

no profile record

comments

Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
Musk has always been adept at lying and creating hype. He said he acquired Twitter "for political purposes, because Trump was banned, so he wanted a platform where never banned." Do you think a biggest capitalist would lose money on something like that? While this reason sounds very "American values"—too American values, like spending billions of dollars to make a movie—so it's probably not. If we analyze it from a Chinese values perspective(Musk is very familiar with China and is also part of Epstein Class; he couldn't possibly be unaware of this. And is it because of his relationship with China that he has access to Chinese channels that are even more Epstein-like than Epstein's, thus making him look down on Epstein's resources? It's quite possible.), given Musk's penchant for having children, he might be got his eyes at the dating resources on Twitter (since Twitter is essentially a one-night stand,compensated dating and prostitution app). By buy Twitter,can make he could gain access to all the personal data on dating services.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
Consider this: people chose the far right to ban marijuana legalization, only to have the far right controlled by drug-addicted tech buddies. Choosing the left simply means non-drug-using politicians tolerating drug use by the homeless; choosing the far right, on the other hand, directly allows self-producing and self-consuming drug dealers and users (whether it's actual drugs or the "spiritual opium" of social media) to rule America. You might think the far right is the kind of people who want you to return to a comfortable rural life, but the real far right rulers are the ones who want to spread the Chinese Satanism and the Chinese model of cyberpunk dystopia—with its tens of millions of cameras that can turn on your smart device at any time to take nude photos—to the United States.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
Over a decade ago, when Facebook held a monopoly, having one's first sexual experience at age 12 or even earlier was an incredibly prestigious and fashionable thing. If Zuckerberg truly held this view, it wouldn't be surprising at all; it would even be considered perfectly reasonable. And those who want to censor these things aren't leftists, but genuine conservatives. Despite the efforts of Musk and other Silicon Valley figures to distort the definition of conservative through their propaganda, and even with many people having short memories, their lies are easily exposed. Unless "having sex at age 12" is a long-standing American traditional value, it's no closer to conservatism than the so-called Muslim immigrants. Looking back now, the propaganda advocating for sex at age 12 may very well have been a carefully orchestrated global pedophile ideology infiltration by elite pedophiles of Epstein's class. It wasn't limited to the Americas or Europe; it was also widespread and accepted in China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Southeast Asia. After Epstein's death in 2019, has such propaganda decreased significantly? Is this a coincidence? It's very likely not a coincidence. This argument is worth exploring; following this line of thought might uncover even more valuable research on field of deep state. While Epstein was a billionaire, he wasn't exceptionally wealthy on paper and shouldn't have possessed such immense influence and control. Therefore, there's only one possibility is profound: Epstein was Satoshi Nakamoto!
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
Information should certainly be kept confidential, but Chat Control is also necessary.Furthermore, the former is merely rigid laws and regulations, while the latter is used to prevent the Satanists, which is capable of committing all kinds of evil.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
I don't know what Palantir can do, whether it's good or bad, but countering China is the top priority. Four British prime ministers have been monitored by China. British politicians visiting China even have to change clothes under a bed sheet. More than six months ago, there were rumors that Palantir was behind all of this, but it was actually China that did it.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
It's said that people have known about the fear of Satanism since the Middle Ages. How did ancient Satanists communicate? We all know that modern Satanists communicate through the dark web or things like Telegram and WhatsApp.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
That's right. Just over a decade ago, reading magazines like "Story Club" was considered a waste of time and energy.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
Yes, sheet music is also a book. I read a lot of sheet music every year. And I really hate books that are full of fluff.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
It's not necessarily a "waste of money," but it's certainly highly deceptive. For example, China has built a large number of unprofitable infrastructure projects and abandoned projects over the past two decades. Even though they lost money, the waste during construction still made China the world's second-largest economy and aroused envy among some ignorant right-wingers. However, this cost has overdrawn the resources for the next few decades. It has caused China's fertility rate to fall below 1, meaning there won't be enough population to repay this debt in the future, let alone enough money for maintenance (even though many of these facilities were never economically viable to begin with). China's bankruptcy is only a matter of time. Moreover, China owes not only economic debt, but also significant "cultural debt" and "civilizational debt." The Chinese government and society's attempt to raise money through illegal means and extortion by issuing "cultural debt" and "civilizational debt" will undoubtedly result in another collapse.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
"Being linked to the state" doesn't always mean being bound by social status and money, but rather receiving support in terms of social status and money. For example, artist support, even if government support is contingent on "the work conforming to LGBT trends," is better than nothing. How can a scientist's passion for science remain connected to the 99% of the public who have no interest in and know nothing about science? As for whether it's a low-quality paper or genuine research, that depends entirely on the conscience and ethics of the practitioners; no policy direction, left or right, can solve this. Left-wing fabrication is plagiarism, right-wing fabrication becomes illegal fundraising and financial fraud. Right-wing fabrication is far more destructive and harmful.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
Mathematics does not actually exist; it is merely a simplification of geometry. Without geometry, mathematics would not exist.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
Since the Warring States period, China has been a purely Machiavellian ideological state. The United States has clearly been influenced by the Chinese. The US has received many Chinese immigrants, and Europe has also received a significant number. What's the difference? Those who choose the US are often driven by a desire to "make a name for themselves" and "build strong power," while those who choose Europe tend to be more inclined to "enjoy a comfortable life." Before I developed a deep-seated hatred for the Illuminati and Satanism, I never intended to endorse the former; I preferred the latter. Even so, I don't want to accept Machiavellianism or the Dark Enlightenment. Darkness is merely a means to combat darkness, not truth or an end. Therefore, I prefer an Islamic ideology that "cleans out these psychologically dark and morally corrupt infidels and then returns to a simple and orderly fairy tale world," rather than some neo-Nazi Dark Enlightenment truth.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
The evolution of European history is built upon the evolution of art, specifically in architectural history, music history, and painting history. It has never been reflected in the evolution of technology; even if technology has evolved, it is built upon the evolution of art, such as steampunk, atomic punk, and cyberpunk. All European culture is characterized by its art-driven approach. However, when, as is the case now, cultural evolution is dominated by programmers, geeks, and dictators, it becomes a dystopian phenomenon. Art-driven approaches represent the correct way of sensory perception and intellectual summarization, much like the correct methodology offered by Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Technological dominance, on the other hand, becomes an erroneous approach of abstract mechanics and objective facts, much like mechanical materialism encountering quantum physics. Remember my words.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
Classical music and popular music are two completely different fields, and there is almost no way to evaluate them interchangeably.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
Playing a musical instrument is far more athletic than sports, requires more scientific practice, and is more "competitive." The only difference is the scoring method. Music doesn't test "who can finish playing in the shortest time," but during practice, speeds faster or slower than the original tempo have already been practiced. Sports are about "who can push their limits"; in musical instrument playing, the very act of "practicing a complete, challenging piece" is already a limit. The difference is that it doesn't require pushing further limits.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
There are no child prodigies yes or no in musical instrument playing. Because regardless of whether one is a prodigy or not, to become a basic,only basic, fundamental performer, one already needs to practice diligently from a childhood.Sometimes it's just a difference in the pieces they practice. Some children played musical pieces when they were young, while others only played etudes. The former might make people think they are child prodigies, while the latter might make people think they are not, but in fact they are the same.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
Power also needs to be justified. Hitler is an example of "unjustifiable might." And all fools who want to promote Darwinism need to know that causing one's own extinction is far easier than causing one's own evolution. Evolution is merely a survivor bias, and Darwin's On the Origin of Species didn't analyze the patterns of extinction.The evolutionary pattern should be that only when you yourself are perfectly rational can you eliminate the irrational enemy. Some people are inherently irrational, yet they try to use Darwinian "survival of the fittest" as their belief to eliminate rational beings, ultimately leading only to their own extinction. This is what happened, is happening, and will happen.Might makes right is not an Rights; Rights are Rights. Might is might, and Right is Right. The statement "might makes right" is rife with literary folly.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
Shouldn't the DEA be the weakest agency? Now that the drug problem requires the involvement of the Department of Homeland Security, the War Department, and the U.S. military, shouldn't the DEA be shut down?
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
1. You won't know the detailed plans or goals of China's top leaders; nobody knows, not even the mouthpieces within the Chinese system. 2. There's a significant chance the US will intervene militarily in Taiwan, while Europe is highly unlikely to do so, as it hasn't even taken significant action in the Russia-Ukraine war. Japan, however, is very likely not to stand idly by. 3. Public opinion in Taiwan is already predominantly pro-independence, and a large portion of the remaining non-independence supporters are simply afraid of war. Europeans (at least European media or commentators) are very unreliable; when the Russia-Ukraine war broke out, Europeans actually thought, "Wow, so there can be war in Europe too." Why would Europe be immune to war? There's no reason why Europe should be guaranteed to avoid war. If there is, then that reason is a "compensatory" one, using compromise with other evils to avoid war.
Revolution1120
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
This is no longer a matter of adults or minors; this is a matter of terrorist acts committed by a satanic cult and organized crime. And the response will not be limited to legal means; we will seek to respond with the same kind of terrorist tactics.