"Huge congrats on the launch! I recently had the opportunity to contribute to Hive by identifying and resolving a critical issue. It was a fantastic experience working with the codebase and the community."
The issue was: Make success-criterion evaluation assumptions explicit in Outcome Aggregator.
I fixed it by: Previously, all success criteria were implicitly treated as success-rate based, which could lead to misleading progress and met values for unsupported or future criterion types. This change ensures that only success rate criteria are evaluated, while others return a neutral, un-met status until proper evaluators are implemented.
This improves clarity, correctness, and observability of the evaluation system without introducing breaking changes.