Living paycheck to paycheck is not the converse of saving.
When I save money, I invest it in productive enterprise. Thus, I have less in my checking account. You could even consider (gasp) that I'm living pay check to pay check!
All those features are hogshit, completely irrelevant, and extremely complicated and difficult to achieve. I have never once watched a movie and said "I didn't like that movie. Let me watch it again with taller actors and more rounded furniture."
Software freedom is the ability to do whatever you want with the code, for example, compiling it. I'm not saying there's any sort of license violation here, but it's not in the spirit of software freedom to "not supposed to install software [from source]"
You're right, all solid savings plans must fit comfortably beneath a mattress. Reminds me of the old saying "If I can't lie down and sleep on top of it comfortably, it's not an investment"
Hang on I almost read that as meaning bitcoin has less financial capability as fiat currency, which we all know is patently false because the premise of bitcoin is centered around an increased flexibility compared with fiat currency.
If you can completely obliterate your margin like that just to make a single sale, I suspect prices are too high and you'd end up doing better by just offering the product at $400.
I've always been told by labview advocates that "you can of course pull up a text editor and write code." The language and API is certainly a different matter, being a second class citizen and presumably an afterthought.
I agree, I can't keep up, I just finished learning backbone.js and now I've
found out on HN that it's old news, and I should use ember.js, cross that, it
has opinions, I should use Meteor, no, AngularJS, no, Tower.js (on node.js),
and for html templates I need handlebars, no mustache, wait, DoT.js is better,
hang on, why do I need an HTML parser inside the browser? isn't that what the
browser for? so no HTML templates? ok, DOM snippets, fine, Web Components you
say? W3C are in the game too? you mean write REGULAR JavaScript like the Google
guys? yuck, oh, I just should write it with CofeeScript and it will look ok,
not Coffee? Coco? LiveScript? DART? GWT? ok, let me just go back to Ruby on
Rails, oh it doesn't scale? Grails? Groovy? Roo? too "Springy?" ok, what about
node.js? doesn't scale either?? but I can write client side, server side and
mongodb side code in the same language? (but does it have to be JavaScript?)
ok, what about PHP, you say it's not really thread safe? they lie?? ok, let me
go back to server coding, it's still Java right? no? Lisp? oh it's called
Clojure? well, it has a Bridge / protocol buffers / thrift implementation so we
can be language agnostic, so we can support our Haskell developers. Or just go
with Scala/Lift/Play it's the BEST framework (Foresquare use it, so it has to
be good). of course we won't do SOAP and will use only JSON RESTful services
cause it's only for banks and Walmart, and god forbid to use a SQL database it
will never scale
I've had it, I'm going to outsource this project... they will probably use a
wordpress template and copy paste jQuery to get me the same exact result
without the headache and in <del>half</del>quarter the price
Never ran into any problems with vanilla zsh on Arch, Debian, or OSX -- just pacman -Ss zsh || apt-get install zsh || brew install zsh. What kind of problems did you run into?
