That's not correct. In the same paragraph it states that in general a digital analysis of information is necessary for increasing police effectiveness and that this is suitable under constitutional law.
The issue that the constitutional court is pointing out, is that there is no appropriate threshold for using such analysis software. In other words they that that you can't use is for anything, just when it is really necessary and proportional.
The issue that the constitutional court is pointing out, is that there is no appropriate threshold for using such analysis software. In other words they that that you can't use is for anything, just when it is really necessary and proportional.