whoooow ! problem of current web is exact opposite - there is too LITTLE information about content, i would love to have some additional tags,
bring some LATEX into web!
so we can have UI "skins"/ themes for all pages exactly same, because it will be client side software responsibility to render it and user chooses theme as user wants / needs i.e disabilities, machine reading so i can actaully use my 4000 dollar gpu with 4gb vram to read text for me. and because of STANDARDIZATION those themes will be universaly working, not i can choose drakoola on reddit but i have to choose monokai on gogole news because those are most similar themes to each other, which i get dictated to use by corporation. corporation dictates how ti should look. i want t oit to look exactly same. it will be easier to consume, less traffic will be needed becasue les page loads, content can be dynamically added i.e. new reddit comment etc
do not use BOLD, use EMPHASIS, do tell me what content of picture is by inserting WORDS INTO DESCRIPTION so i can choose if i need to load it or it is just some placeholder /ad which i dont have to see
and most people forgets that HTML is NOT meant to be read by people but read by MACHINES.
HTML is as bad implementation of latex as RSS is bad implementation of USENET
same primitive s... as with current AI, it can tell you if there is dog in picture but it cannot tell you more about that picture, what exactly is meaning/essence of picture of that dog in there.
im not trolling , im not joking.
web 1 was awesome because i can literaly PUT FREAKING links to content directly, web 2.0. YOU CANT. this should be made mandatory, make dark web 10 % of web !
i was flabbergasted when i think google? announced that you can now create a hyperlink to a specific location in another Web page like WHAT ? you mean i can actually use thing i used in freaking firefox 2.0 or in netscape navigator ? you cant be serious ! XD
but this is state of thing. try to link some FAANG forum page from 2013. you cant because hierarchy of whole "forum" changed and you have to manualy search for answer
and not even start about twitter which dont let you browse without logging in. i dont mind logging in if logging is NOT paired with my number etc.
now imagine having this in your emacs / lynks (webbrowser) window wouldnt be that freaking crazy nice? you can choose which users comment will be highlighted ( friend, replying to you, contains some word...) CLIENT SIDE so there will be less bandwidth and resources wasted fro coprporation.
so we can have UI "skins"/ themes for all pages exactly same, because it will be client side software responsibility to render it and user chooses theme as user wants / needs i.e disabilities, machine reading so i can actaully use my 4000 dollar gpu with 4gb vram to read text for me. and because of STANDARDIZATION those themes will be universaly working, not i can choose drakoola on reddit but i have to choose monokai on gogole news because those are most similar themes to each other, which i get dictated to use by corporation. corporation dictates how ti should look. i want t oit to look exactly same. it will be easier to consume, less traffic will be needed becasue les page loads, content can be dynamically added i.e. new reddit comment etc
do not use BOLD, use EMPHASIS, do tell me what content of picture is by inserting WORDS INTO DESCRIPTION so i can choose if i need to load it or it is just some placeholder /ad which i dont have to see
and most people forgets that HTML is NOT meant to be read by people but read by MACHINES.
HTML is as bad implementation of latex as RSS is bad implementation of USENET
same primitive s... as with current AI, it can tell you if there is dog in picture but it cannot tell you more about that picture, what exactly is meaning/essence of picture of that dog in there.
im not trolling , im not joking.
web 1 was awesome because i can literaly PUT FREAKING links to content directly, web 2.0. YOU CANT. this should be made mandatory, make dark web 10 % of web !
i was flabbergasted when i think google? announced that you can now create a hyperlink to a specific location in another Web page like WHAT ? you mean i can actually use thing i used in freaking firefox 2.0 or in netscape navigator ? you cant be serious ! XD
but this is state of thing. try to link some FAANG forum page from 2013. you cant because hierarchy of whole "forum" changed and you have to manualy search for answer
and not even start about twitter which dont let you browse without logging in. i dont mind logging in if logging is NOT paired with my number etc.
now imagine having this in your emacs / lynks (webbrowser) window wouldnt be that freaking crazy nice? you can choose which users comment will be highlighted ( friend, replying to you, contains some word...) CLIENT SIDE so there will be less bandwidth and resources wasted fro coprporation.