I'm so glad an accused rapist will join the supreme court without an FBI investigation, while republicans are trying to bully google out of censoring the horrible shit said by the right.
> I'm going to invite everybody to think like
a game theorist for a bit.
I knew from this line that this post was going to anger me.
I was right.
> It is perfectly consistent to be pro-tolerance and pro-inclusion while believing this subculture ought to be all about producing good code without regard to who is offended by the process.
It's not.
> That last paragraph may sound like I have strayed from neutrality
Is he really writing this and claiming to be neutral? This reads very much as an anti-CoC message.
For example,
> If the normativeness slider is set low, the group as a whole will tolerate
behavior that some people in it will consider negative and offensive.
If the normativeness level is set high, many effects are less visible;
contributors who chafe under restriction will defect (usually quietly)
and potential contributors will be deterred from joining
having to work within a code of conduct will cause people to chafe and leave, but he mentions nothing of the idea that having someone treating your horribly will cause you to leave.