Does this still create waste that is dangerous for thousands of years?
My understanding is that there is no long term solution for storing dangerous nuclear waste. They try burying it super deep in mountains. But can't be sure that it won't get out in the next few thousands of years.
Everybody watch the documentary "Into Eternity" on the subject. Amazing.
hoping this becomes a sustainable open source project... go Logseq!
For power users...
I was specifically looking the feature 'named properties' aka 'key-value pairs'. Which AFAIK is unique to logseq, absent from the other outliners (Roam, Obsidian, Athens...)
https://docs.logseq.com/#/page/term%2Fproperties
I'd love to know what cost they have put for 100k of storage of nuclear waste. Talk about intergenerational debt.
Surely once storage costs are factored into nuclear energy, renewables are much much more cost effective, without all the risks of nuclear waste spilling out at some point in the next 100k years?!?!