What if the government forced us all to buy BigMacs every day under threat of jail time? Some people would certainly be happy that they are being fed “for free” (deducted prepay for two weeks of government bigmacs from each paycheck + convenience fee + online payment fee + tax), but you might not. Further, this is also assuming government finds the most effective solutions at the lowest cost. Usually they just do the latter to meet the absolute bare minimum. There’s no way for government services to be zero cost, so they assign their own overhead.
So now we have a Department of Burgers in every state. Everyone has to buy them every day, if you dont you go to prison, you cant see the cost breakdown of the bigmacs and the quality is inferior to private BigMacs. Some people who love bigmacs and would buy them anyways say “I am glad the government forced me to pay for them. Thats a lot of the job!”, and those who would never buy them find negative value from such a proposal.
What I’m trying to say is that even if you anecdotally agree, it does not make it right.
This is awesome. How does this compare to the Pentaho reporting platform?
I see you have a browser-based version as well, how performant is it really? Our company currently uses Pentaho for reporting and it's a nightmare - goes down all the time, code is a black box, impossible to work with. This seems like it's really performant and suited for the task at hand, great work.
Do you know if anyone has had success deploying this as a service for multiple users? Could we run this on a cluster and allow individual users to have accounts on the platform?
Can we please stop calling him Beto? It's clearly intended to try to appeal to the growing Hispanic electorate by making him sound Hispanic/Latino, when in reality he's totally white and Irish. To pretend otherwise is disingenuous.
Is that proof really indicative or is it something like "someone using cyrillic keyset edited this so it was russia 100% guaranteed". I am very curious to see what they determined is proof.
It's actually an anti-statist pushback. Elsevier no longer represents the interests of the community at large. Academic professionals interact with them only when it's absolutely necessary, NOT because they add any value. Literally an artificial monopoly.
New technology such as the web has allowed us to remove the need for this middle man of distribution.
As the title says, it improves overall health. Nobody mentioned weight loss.
From the article, "...optimal fasting in a timed manner would be strategic to positively affect cellular functions and ultimately benefiting health and protecting against aging-associated diseases."
what other trade agreement asks for freedom of movement in addition to access to the common market? can you name one other deal on the planet which does this?
they are already in jail for committing crimes and are offered between status quo or to fight fires. they are already in jail, so you cannot threaten to put someone into a situation they are already in.
If we start to allow those who can't afford the congestion pricing to get a discount on congestion pricing, do we really have congestion pricing? Or just a new proportional-to-income "driving tax" in addition to state, county, and city taxes?
What if the government forced us all to buy BigMacs every day under threat of jail time? Some people would certainly be happy that they are being fed “for free” (deducted prepay for two weeks of government bigmacs from each paycheck + convenience fee + online payment fee + tax), but you might not. Further, this is also assuming government finds the most effective solutions at the lowest cost. Usually they just do the latter to meet the absolute bare minimum. There’s no way for government services to be zero cost, so they assign their own overhead.
So now we have a Department of Burgers in every state. Everyone has to buy them every day, if you dont you go to prison, you cant see the cost breakdown of the bigmacs and the quality is inferior to private BigMacs. Some people who love bigmacs and would buy them anyways say “I am glad the government forced me to pay for them. Thats a lot of the job!”, and those who would never buy them find negative value from such a proposal.
What I’m trying to say is that even if you anecdotally agree, it does not make it right.