Saying "there is age discrimination in the tech industry" is looking at the symptoms. The root cause is not being able to look at it from the system's viewpoint that causes it.
Tech industry especially the cutting/bleeding edge segment, is a crapshoot. Its survival depends on breaking rules, boundaries, assumptions and being starry-eyed believers
Seasoned engineers appear to "project" they are fixated on things knowingly or unknowingly. If you are doing it unknowingly - time to review one's communication style.
Also, this segment survives (or emerges out of) by riding the technology shifts. For example, here is a shift in the software programming segment.
green screen -> desktop -> web -> mobile -> deep learning.
Most companies do prefer to hire senior members who have experience with prior technology segment and are attempting a newer one.
Very concise. Btw, I see that you created this tool. It is a brilliant tool. Just wish people would start using this tool to explain the steps instead of writing them in ad filled/narrow column pages.
I always wondered why doesn't the government install a few hundred web cams across the big cities for the rest of world, including the journalists to see the reality. Why do only the journalists have to travel there and take pictures of whatever corner they want and tell whatever story they want to tell.
I tried using AirTable twice. It has a steep learning curve. The UI comes in the way often.
If they really have day-to-day users - they must be from the top down approach (somebody up the chain selected it) or forcefully committed ones or a have a perfect use-case.
a. These are meant for a business to show off its compliance. A business means it is already making money. I am sure every company would be happy to pay that 100CHF to buy it for you , just like they can afford to buy a book, if they are thinking about ISO.
b. The ISO compliance is to be asserted by a 3rd party auditor. They are a member of the ISO community and/or have a copy of the standard with them.
I went through hearing the similar ("talking like an engineer") comment myself. One thing made a big difference in transitioning
to company leadership.
I thought I was a leader of the people reporting to me.
A leader in a generic sense, as in civic leaders.
I have to fight for or work towards their betterment.
With that thinking, every discussion with upper management would come across as the defence, for the team, for the processes.
One executed corrected my understanding that I am not a generic leader. I am a company leader. That means the company is first and foremost. My communication and thought process has to reflect that.
It sounded a bit harsh in the beginning but it helped me become a better company leader and good for the people reporting to me and customers in the long run.
>> Gorbachev held firm. “‘As the ex-leader, I just would not,’” Helbing recalled Gorbachev saying.
It is not clear why he wouldn't do that.