What Apple selling as "Sign in with Apple" is one of the "tool" I created to fix email spam. It is very much related.
This is the problem of throwing arguments without understanding the context.
If you had gone through that blog post and read the section "what is the real invention" carefully, then you would understand how "sign in with apple" system is very much related to my antispam methods.
Which is why Apple engineers started to read my paper in Feb 2019 and "sign in with apple" ready by June 2019.
Have you ever thought about it the other way? You find my technical post as ramblings because you don't have enough technical skills to understand the merits of my work?
Question 4 and 9 reveals how they are stealing my work. I actually lied about the patent filing date in the mail I sent to Tim Cook. Once you file the patent you cannot add new content. That's why they boldly published that techcrunch post.
I lied about the patent date because I sensed Apple looking at my iCloud files without my permission and I was right. This is what I had in Apple's iCloud.
That's why they bought it when I told them "I filed the patent in 2018". I filed only the provisional patent application. I fixed most of the technical loopholes after that.
My white paper says "e.g. Signup Forms, Facebook Connect , Google Connect etc.".
Apple stole that with this excuse. "Note that Apple is not saying “social” login though. It’s saying “third-party,” which is more encompassing.". I.e. They categorized "Facebook Connect , Google Connect" as "Social Login" buttons to steal it. Please see Techcrunch question number 9.
You can clearly see he goes like "possibly because the patent office yet has to publish it". That's because he bought what I sold.
If you pay attention to his response he goes like "Apple's products or marketing strategies might seem similar".
If you take a closer look at the mail I sent to Tim Cook, you can see that I never mentioned anything about "Strategy". They are stealing both my product as well as strategy. That's why he explicitly mentioned the word "strategy" to convince me.
For the record, they didn't release the product on June 3, 2019. They only announced it at that time. It took them few more months.
I'm the guy who created the ORIGINAL system what Apple selling as "Sign in with Apple". [My system uses the industry standards like OAuth2. Apple ditched OAuth2 just to steal my work]
This EPIC GAMES ban isn't "personal" as you all think.
If Apple don't ban "Sign in with Apple" for epic games, then Apple is very much screwed. That's because I wrote the patent claim in such a way.
Someone who had gone through my blog post shared the blog post in HackerNews 4 months back. Our wonderful Hacker news users flagged the post, because they all believes Apple is a wonderful company.
That's right. All the companies that supports "Sign in with Apple", especially on the web and android violating my work. Some of them are popular companies. e.g. Adobe, Dropbox, Airbnb, Airbnb, Medium, Spotify, WordPress, Vimeo, Meetup, Buzzfeed, Grammerly
That was something else. When Craig Federighi announced "sign in with apple" he mentioned "We wanted to solve this, and many developers do too. So, now we have a solution".
Bluemail developers thought, Craig was talking about them. Apple copied my work with the help of a prior art filed before Bluemail disclosure. Craig was referring to my work.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.364265...