That feels like a straw man. Perhaps we have to define weirdness before we pass judgement.
Blatant fascism/racism/homophobia etc.: Justifiably censurable according to the ECHR [0], specifically see Article 10.2, Article 11.2 and Article 17. See for example _E.S v Austria_.
Google hammer: Weird but not in violation of human rights conventions.
People are worth the use value they can produce. If they can produce a commodity faster than the socially necessary labor time they're worth more than average. If not they're worth less than average.
Wikipedia doesn't have moderators. They do have Administrators, who can be "removed by a ruling of the Arbitration Committee" [0]. They can also be removed for other reasons, such as inactivity, and similar.
Social-Democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism. There is no ground for assuming that the fighting organisation of the bourgeoisie can achieve decisive successes in battles, or in governing the country, without the active support of Social-Democracy… These organisations do not negate, but supplement each other. They are not antipodes, they are twins.
Race is a protected class. Religion is, national origin is. Age, sex, pregnancy, citizenship, familial status, disability, veteran, and genetic status is.
Businesses aren't protected from discrimination under US federal law. They're not protected BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT PEOPLE.