> Sounds reasonably handy, do you rely on users to tell you if the LLM generated simplifications are misleading?
Not yet, but this is in our roadmap for sure
> EXCEPT the actual authors would verify and publish specific alternates.
This is also a good one, except that there's already 100s of millions of research papers that need to be summarized. But probably we can ask the audience / researchers themselves to verify summaries once we produce a summary for a particular paper
> what does "Let AI simplify articles, clarify terms, and help you do research" mean?
If you select a text from a paper and click on "Simplify" in a popup, it will try to tell you what it means. The "help you do research" is a more broad part thought huh
> Is it something revolutionary and amazingly useful like that
We (right now a team of two) plan to develop an AI-assisted peer review. What I mean is that we can use LLMs to check for some "bad things" in paper (like small sample size or some weird hypothesis etc) + analyze the comments and the users behind these comments.
> just deciding what to show you in a feed based on past history?
Surely not, but this is what we already have in the product right now
Nope, I'm sorry if I was unclear, I was saying I've removed requirement to click on articles in the feed. This is a bit more complicated task with categories (due to some backend things I need to change), but I do understand the problem
No worries, I've just removed this, now you can freely read any article with no account needed.
> I tried to check out the categories
Hm, okay!
> But when prompted for a login/sign-up, I lost interest.
This is a one I cannot remove that fast (due to the way backend processes these categories), but I'm just curious, why did you loose an interest? I mean, yes, it requires login, and so?
No worries, I've just removed this, now you can read articles with no account needed. Honestly, thanks a lot for the feedback, that's the most valuable thing to have at this stage :)
> had less information on the page
Is it a bad thing? I mean, I can add some sort of a setting to display more / less content in different density, is this what you'd want?