> the system used binary structures in shared memory to communicate across processes, which were running code written in two entirely different languages.
You have a reasonable expectation of privacy inside an abode. If a patron left a recording device, they likely would be in violation of Federal and/or State laws.
> Obviously AWS has a lead in the market with regards to tools and functinalities as they were early to the cloud game
I really disagree with this statement. Having used both AWS and Azure, Azure is leaps and bounds ahead with the tools they provide. It's possible AWS made efforts to catch up, it's been several years since I ported everything from AWS to Azure.
Because it's not. Azure and AWS are largely comparable. The only reason to select your cloud provider between Azure and AWS is the feature set you care most about.
If you are a .NET shop, Azure absolutely dominates AWS for what it provides.
Much riskier proposition because you have no idea of the timeframe of WHEN their positions will be divested. Your margin might get called before it happens and you lose or lose alot. With the long position buying the stock prior to its entry to the index you have a much more reliable indicator that you'll make profit.
Honestly the simplest thing to do is just monitor the big houses and whatever they do en masse do the same. Most giant purchases have to be announced and 10M shares aren't just bought on a whim.
When i used to very actively trade stock (even just thousands of dollars) i used to monitor releases from companies like MSFT's and Buffet's holding companies announcing upcoming stock purchases. I would then immediately buy the stock before they can. Then i would sell it a few days or few weeks after their purchase to lock in my 10-35% gain.
No. Government meddling in a free economy is doomed to failure.
The only protections a free economy needs with the government is protection from cartels/monopolies and from market manipulators. Also said manipulators are likely foreign nations or atleast entities. Like when the US Steel industry was destroyed for us rebuilding Japan with better steel mills than our own country's and not introducing tariffs to make Japanese steel higher cost than American.
This inarguably shows the fallacy of "central planning." The government cannot ever out smart a free economy. When the government refuses to allow the free economy: illegal black markets arise and legal fiefdoms are spawned both at the expense of the regular citizen. Who benefits from centralized planning? There's only 2 classes that benefit, the government class and the criminal class.
The simplest solution is just end absurdity like this. Let the free market dictate how many cabs should exist and what fares should exist. Might people become overzealous, overfill supply then strangle themselves from it? Sure. Is it that a bad thing? No. The market will correct, suppliers will leave and supply and demand will resolve the imbalance as it always does.