This is a case of should be this way, but never will be. People have and always will respond to personal incentives, which is why framing this way is doing well.
If people are incentivized to get solar roofs for personal benefits and it happens to also help the "Life Economy," this is good. Especially because more people will get them when they're framed in terms of what an individual gains from installing it, not what Humanity gains.
Right but randomly posting in a link to Veblen good on Wikipedia because it's one example of when raising prices doesn't lower demand doesn't mean it's in any way relevant to this discussion. Almost no one would argue that this kind of travel is a Veblen good.
Maybe not have a complete opposite that could also be valid, but at least state some sort of preference or be able to be used to make a real decision.
He goes on to say that he wants to push decision making ability down in the company, but if you're looking at those 3 values, it seems hard to make clear decisions based on them.
What did you find well written about the culture? Genuinely curious, because I have the exact opposite view. The culture section is blatantly obvious and the new values don't seem to provide any guiding force. Pushing down decision making in the company (a point of his which I agree with) only works if the values you're pushing actually inform action. Which these don't.