There does need to be some sort of sane standard for determining whether something counts as a threat/incitement if they're not going to be permitted.
Say I'm very popular on twitter, and say I don't like somebody for whatever reason. If there's a reasonable expectation that this will result in them being mobbed by my less personable followers, does that count as incitement?
Or at what point does aggressive banter in good faith become an actual threat in [favorite multiplayer video game]?
On the other hand, targeted subsidies can push economies of scale to tipping points of self-sustainability.
If there's lots of low hanging fruit then a broad tax/subsidy makes sense, but if you need high levels of investment into specific things to make a difference, then use the tool for the job.
Which end of the spectrum incentivizing green behavior/tech mainly lies towards is left as an exercise for the reader.
Having played around with building exactly that, the conclusion I came to is that REST is nice for not having the additional setup step of establishing a websocket connection as well as having the considerably better support for simultaneous http requests over rebuilding that part of the networking stack once again and layering it on top of everything else.
For real-time subscriptions though, websockets (pardon my grammar) are wonderful. Hence why all the above will probably be ignored as they become a trend and people at large learn the sensible limits of what to use them for.
Now you've got me curious how much people have experimented with making AIs play "incremental" games where there's literally nothing but build order planning.
A journal made up of both digital logs and a physical notepad, a graph of associations between things, and a wiki for deeper details on specific topics.
Network effects of people who held one that skyrocketed then diversifying into others and news around any given one skyrocketing drawing people to the space in general.
Not to mention that every single one is an experiment that feeds back into the collective knowledge of what makes a good cryptocurrency, even as any individual one can only choose a single set of all the known tradeoffs.
Now I'm curious how much someone's chance of having seen/played anything Steins;Gate goes up when preconditioned on visiting Hacker News at least once a week.
I'm trying to get an online community together over the next few months for some of the same stuff. More generally for learning through collaborative experimentation. My email's in my profile if you're interested.
You might try setting up a simple blog and chatroom combo specifically for what you're learning and trying to get a few others to join in on some parts for the mutual support. Half your list is stuff I'd love to join in on if the timing worked out and I doubt I'm the only one if you do decide to get small groups together for at least some parts of your adventures.
Worth mentioning is also the typical advice of teaching others being one of the most effective learning methods.
Honorable mentions for tackling part of the problem go to IPFS and Scuttlebutt.
There's a lot of people who understand the larger vision around the decentralization crowd if you can find them in the haystack of hypesters.