this is a bold move for something that as controversial in the academic community about publications. I think this puts into perspective that there are certain biases on which studies gets published aka if you have money you can certainly get published on this paid publications.
I guess they didn't think of the byproduct when designing this. Question is, why didn't they add this on the lifecycle assessment, I'm sure they know from the start that there is a byproduct. How to handle this waste, ergo, toxic waste should've been treated as an important part of the process.
As a person with MDD, I'm glad studies like these are coming out. This is the best resource material I've seen about MDD and it's helped me a lot https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOAgplgTxfc