A big challenge is to get references working correctly.
LaTeXML is quite good at converting latex documents to html [1], including references such as Theorem 2.1, equation (8.1) etc.
For instance, the paper [2] appears to be quite readable on mobile, and clicking/tapping on a reference such as (8.1) leads you to equation (8.1) as you would expect.
The auto-generation of Arxiv-Vanity is really nice, maybe it would be easy to add the LatexML output too?
If the referendum unlawful, then some people will not go to vote, simply because they usually avoid breaking the law.
The result would be valid (from a probabilistic point of view) if "going to vote" was independent of "voting yes". But if the there is any correlation between "going to vote" and "voting yes" then the result of the referendum will be significantly different than the result of a referendum where any individual was forced to vote.
Here there might be a correlation: people in favor or independence or more likely to go voting than others.
A similar phenomenon may have happened in the us. If there is a correlation between "lying to polls" and "voting for candidate A" then the poll predictions can become very wrong.
For instance, the paper [2] appears to be quite readable on mobile, and clicking/tapping on a reference such as (8.1) leads you to equation (8.1) as you would expect.
The auto-generation of Arxiv-Vanity is really nice, maybe it would be easy to add the LatexML output too?
[1]: http://www.albany.edu/~hammond/demos/Html5/arXiv/lxmlexample...
[2]: http://www.albany.edu/~hammond/demos/Html5/arXiv/LaTeXML/110...