Based on all the images on the product page, can SOMEONE please tell what which side is the front of this car? The side with the AWS logo looks most car like, but the logo makes it look like it runs with the black side first.
As a network engineer for over 2 decades, I've been skeptical of IPv6 for the majority of them.
I still am.
As IPv4 becomes more scarce, two economic forces trigger
1) They become more valuable (read more desired). IPv4 has all the network effects going for it. It's where 99.9% of the Internet already is. .1% being IPv6 only devices.
2) To counter the rising value/cost: Workaround/Kludges/Alternatives to every devices needing a globally unique address are tried. Everyone is going to reply with how awful NAT is, and I concede it has its flaws. However, it is hard to deny its success so far. Business then do the cost benefit of the shortcomings of things like NAT vs selling their now valuable IPv4 address space, think where they are going to come down?
Yes but we could could look at the amount of of data transmitted in total. Audio compression is well understood, and can infer within an range of usable quality, if any excess voice or other data is sent over the network.
We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of 'Satoshi Nakamoto' for the week.
But all the decision of that Satoshi have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting.
They can't stream to mobile, and CBS already has apps on all the set top boxes they can stream too. So twitter can stream to browsers?
What exactly did twitter buy here?
Yeah, this should have been included in the article.
From Wikipedia:
A long distance point to point HVDC transmission scheme generally has lower overall investment cost and lower losses than an equivalent AC transmission scheme. HVDC conversion equipment at the terminal stations is costly, but the total DC transmission line costs over long distances are lower than AC line of the same distance. HVDC requires less conductor per unit distance than an AC line, as there is no need to support three phases and there is no skin effect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-voltage_direct_current#Ad...
Prague the school right in the middle of the hot spot, is where I graduated from. However that was well before the rash of earthquakes (1998)
They did have a gym destroyed by a tornado a few years ago. I have not heard of any damage yet from the earthquakes.
The problem with this type of wealth redistribution is that the poor are often consumers of the same products and services served by min wage jobs.
This is one of many reasons I support unconditional basic income. It allows labor to be accurately priced in the market, without raising cost to the poor.
This "out vs in" comparison in order to determine who pays is a meme that won't die. I've never known agreements to be formed in such a way. Maybe before my day in the dial up era when "out vs in" could serve as rule of thumb of sorts to determin who was an access ISP and who was an "Upstream" or "Tier 1" ISP. Can someone provide a source for this?
My understanding is this. No Money exchanges hands between Level3 and Comcast, but there is an agreement for Comcast to provide a port for Level3 to connect to. Level3 brings the traffic to Comcast door Step. Level3 pays for the port on their side. Level3 is happy to add more ports, BUT Comcast Refuses. Not because more ports are that expensive but those in charge at Comcast are from the TV side of the house where blackouts are common negotiating tactics in order to be paid. And Level3 refuse to be held over a barrel for payment when Comcast has a local monopoly power.