HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

levn11

no profile record

Submissions

An Interesting Proof

techrxiv.org
1 points·by levn11·vor 2 Jahren·1 comments

Ask HN: I would like an honest discussion about this math proof?

archive.org
1 points·by levn11·vor 3 Jahren·2 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by levn11·vor 3 Jahren·0 comments

comments

levn11
·vor 8 Monaten·discuss
my life: https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·letztes Jahr·discuss
i mean https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer......
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
so how much do you just stare at grass and yell at the sky
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
I would make food shelters and start a school, a dream of mine.
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
it follows specifically from the form on pages 1-3. i would recommend reading it with fresh eyes after a good night's rest.
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
I won't reply further to this question about g, i do think i've been clear. and at this point you can be on your merry way still thinking it's wrong. but you simply misunderstood.
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
it's a proof by contradiction. g would divide a+b-c IF a+b-c are integers.

for n=2, g(2)=(c-a)(c-b)g_1(2) and g_1(2)=2.

So only when n=2 is it true that g divides a+b-c.

Otherwise we get a contradiction that it divides. since then, g_1(n) for n>2 is not a factor of a+b-c, we can safely assume at least one of them was not an integer.
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
i believe you skipped pages 1-3. g_1(2)=2 for all a,b,c with n=2. g(n) carries with it the assumption of a^n+b^n=c^n as i showed in pages 1-3.
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
This is only true for a,b,c that satisfies a^2+b^2=c^2.

So a=b=3 and c=n=2 is not part of the solution set.
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
which part
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
Exactly. I have my degree as well, so I was doing some research of my own. It’s an ongoing thing.
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170629872.29614231/v1
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
Seems like some kind of novel approach. Looks right to me. But my math is okay, so I need better eyes.
levn11
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
https://figshare.com/articles/preprint/Fermat_s_Last_and_the...
levn11
·vor 3 Jahren·discuss
PLEASE read this as this is literally about thinking of center of mass as existing in more than 0 dimensions. the book is called The Zero Point Paradox and has everything to do about singularities
levn11
·vor 3 Jahren·discuss
They did nothing, apparently. Just kept on keeping on
levn11
·vor 3 Jahren·discuss
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Remote: yes

Willing to relocate: maybe

Technologies: i have a masters in applied math, i know python, i wrote a book, and i am publishing a math proof. But im also in need of employment.

Resume: I will email resume upon request, apologies i dont have a url set up for it.

Email: [email protected]