no discussion about how the authors controlled for respondents from non-western backgrounds
how can we know, for example, that the higher acceptance from those with more postgraduate education is simply that they're just migrants from nonwestern societies
As i build with agents, i frequently run into new issues that arent in scope for the task im on and would cause context drift. I have the agent create a github issue with a short problem description and keep going on the current task. In another terminal i spin up a new agent and just tell it “investigate GH issue 123” and it starts diving in, finds the root cause, and proposes a fix. Depending on what parts of the code the issue fix touches and what other agents ive got going, i can have 3-4 agents more or less independently closing out issues/creating PRs for review at a time. The agents log their work in a work log- what they did, what worked what didnt, problems they encountered using tools - and about once a day i have an agent review the worklog and update the AGENTS.md with lessons learned.
how can we know, for example, that the higher acceptance from those with more postgraduate education is simply that they're just migrants from nonwestern societies
flawed study