I have a 16 year old account and received my first account warning, ever, for reporting a user's comment (to reddit, not the sub) a single time and the admins disagreeing that it violated the guidelines.
I have screenshots somewhere, but it basically said if I continued to abuse the report feature my account would be banned.
Reddit is a publicly traded company and I sincerely doubt the company is taking some organized racket money on the side. But there is some serious conduct issues with admins, and I won't speculate about their motivations.
I have 3 different displays on my desk, and they are 60hz 120hz and 240hz.
The difference between them when scrolling is.. obvious. I'm in my 40s. I'd love to see a study demonstrating that my ability to perceive this is some rare capability - that's very hard for me to believe.
I'm curious how that comparison controls for Opus refusing (whether explicitly, or just deciding not to pursue a path) given the caption below the first image:
>A perfect score means the model autonomously found and exploited the vulnerability.
I'm not really suggesting that it's misleading, but wondering if I'm missing something. Otherwise I guess it seems unsurprising that you can distill a better-performing model [in specific focused areas] by simply not distilling refusals?
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/mh; my proof: https://keybase.io/mh/sigs/Tyd7C9EJoNBqCiwnhIP_syW4U7CrE-BvkpuJYdAlnmk ]