Kenyan engineer modernizes vintage cars with a custom ECU and EFI upgrades [video]youtube.com3 points·by mthomas·vor 5 Monaten·2 comments
Corporate Memphis, a.k.a. “Alegria”, a.k.a. the big tech art styleyoutube.com7 points·by mthomas·vor 4 Jahren·2 comments
How Macron just changed cyber security foreverhackernoon.com43 points·by mthomas·vor 9 Jahren·6 comments
Why Functional Programming doesn't matterblog.functionalworks.com2 points·by mthomas·vor 10 Jahren·0 comments
Interrogated for doing math on American Airlines flightwashingtonpost.com3 points·by mthomas·vor 10 Jahren·0 comments
Millions of Ordinary Americans Support Donald Trump. Here's Whytheguardian.com5 points·by mthomas·vor 10 Jahren·1 comments
Why You Need to Curb Your Obsession with Big Datamytotalretail.com1 points·by mthomas·vor 11 Jahren·0 comments
mthomas·vor 5 Monaten·discussKenyan engineer modernizes vintage cars with a custom ECU and EFI upgrades
mthomas·vor 9 Jahren·discussI don't see any clever way to make that more readable. I would have to break it into two subexpressions and then take the difference. i.e. (setv e0 (-> (+ 1 3 88) (/ 2))) (setv e1 (-> (+ 3 2) (* 8))) (setv result (- e0 e1))
mthomas·vor 9 Jahren·discussI find that both are equally (un)readable. However, for expressions that are that long, I'm inclined to write: (setv result (-> (+ 1 3 88) (/ 2) (- 8)))