>Haranguing other users who show up here to discuss there work is one of the worst things anyone can possibly do here—and yes, that's what you've did: "If that's the case present your data!" — that you were not hired because of your sex and your looks? What the fuck.
No. She said she knows of many cases where men made the exact same horizontal moves in her organization. She said she HAS data. I am simply asking her to present it. Your attitude here is one that is too quick to judge.
>We want authors show up on HN to discuss their writings. The choice between having that vs. having trolls who personally attack them is not a difficult one.
Except I'm not trolling. I am presenting a legitimate view point that is not a personal attack. Her case is very abnormal and I am addressing the abnormality, which is very very reasonable.
You don't hear of many cases where a horizontal shift like this is possible. So it is not an attack. It don't know her personally and I have no reason to attack her. Your statement is categorically incorrect.
I also think your dismissing the intelligence and judgement of your users. This post had a quite high number of upvotes and users of HN are not your classic reddit mob.
The votes are evidence that users of this site don't share your opinion so you used your own biased view points to override my view point and dismissed the majority who agreed with me. Let's be real the people who flagged me are just a vocal minority.
You are moderating based off of your own personal biases and I wish you would just moderate the flame war instead of censoring the topic.
I'm using another account here which you can ban as well (I'll just get another one). I'll be more mindful to follow your guidelines in the future including the arbitrary guideline you made up here on the fly to support your personal biases. I like this site but a highly disagree with your moderation practices.
that's not true. trolling does not get upvoted here. HN users are usually above the mob mentality. You're just defining it as trolling because you disagree with the upvotes. You are enforcing your own personal opinion here.
No. She said she knows of many cases where men made the exact same horizontal moves in her organization. She said she HAS data. I am simply asking her to present it. Your attitude here is one that is too quick to judge.
>We want authors show up on HN to discuss their writings. The choice between having that vs. having trolls who personally attack them is not a difficult one.
Except I'm not trolling. I am presenting a legitimate view point that is not a personal attack. Her case is very abnormal and I am addressing the abnormality, which is very very reasonable.
You don't hear of many cases where a horizontal shift like this is possible. So it is not an attack. It don't know her personally and I have no reason to attack her. Your statement is categorically incorrect.
I also think your dismissing the intelligence and judgement of your users. This post had a quite high number of upvotes and users of HN are not your classic reddit mob.
The votes are evidence that users of this site don't share your opinion so you used your own biased view points to override my view point and dismissed the majority who agreed with me. Let's be real the people who flagged me are just a vocal minority.
You are moderating based off of your own personal biases and I wish you would just moderate the flame war instead of censoring the topic.
I'm using another account here which you can ban as well (I'll just get another one). I'll be more mindful to follow your guidelines in the future including the arbitrary guideline you made up here on the fly to support your personal biases. I like this site but a highly disagree with your moderation practices.