HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

noworld

no profile record

Submissions

A Way to Challenge the Groupthink of Scholarly Journals

wsj.com
3 points·by noworld·letzten Monat·1 comments

NASA Marches Toward Artemis III Mission in 2027, Names Crew Members

nasa.gov
2 points·by noworld·letzten Monat·0 comments

Scientists Precisely Edit Human Embryo DNA. Are 'Engineered Babies' Next?

news18.com
3 points·by noworld·letzten Monat·0 comments

Ukraine captures enemy Russian position using only robots

nypost.com
7 points·by noworld·vor 3 Monaten·0 comments

The Emperor Protects: A Warhammer 40k Musical

youtube.com
3 points·by noworld·vor 3 Monaten·0 comments

Colosseum gets a fresh look recreates the footprints of long-gone columns

apnews.com
4 points·by noworld·vor 4 Monaten·0 comments

We're Not Ready for Superintelligence

youtube.com
3 points·by noworld·vor 9 Monaten·0 comments

comments

noworld
·vor 2 Monaten·discuss
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/u-s-special-forces-won-409k-bet...

Another indicator we could track.
noworld
·vor 2 Monaten·discuss
One time I wrote a game in English.
noworld
·vor 2 Monaten·discuss
Ban the trading and upping the base pay would probably improve accessibility.
noworld
·vor 2 Monaten·discuss
https://status.claude.com/
noworld
·vor 4 Monaten·discuss
‘Unlike most city building games, I'm Sorry Did You Say Street Magic specifically prohibits creating a map due to the historical connections between map-making and colonialism.”

Everyone delete your maps app.
noworld
·vor 4 Monaten·discuss
Like something out of Fallout
noworld
·vor 4 Monaten·discuss
Man, if there were only something more reasonable... something in-between letting them spy at will and concentration camps. Hmmm, maybe we will think of something eventually.
noworld
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
[flagged]
noworld
·vor 6 Monaten·discuss
"extraordinary claims/extraordinary evidence" isn't scientific rigor, it's adding qualifiers to make the evaluation of the claim and evidence more subjective.
noworld
·vor 6 Monaten·discuss
Ah, since the claim contradicts materialism, you get to make up a scenario, present no evidence, then put the burden on the other side. Got it.

There's literally extraordinary evidence in the PDF, you just don't like it.
noworld
·vor 6 Monaten·discuss
I don't think there's a "guarantee" that it wasn't backdated, but there isn't any evidence of that either.
noworld
·vor 6 Monaten·discuss
Can you give me some evidence that this document was backdated? I'm not saying the government isn't shady AF, but I just wonder what's behind the immediate jump to "this has to be BS" rather than keeping an open mind.
noworld
·vor 6 Monaten·discuss
The first PDF is the record of a remote viewing session from 2 days before the USS Stark incident, and it is eerily similar to the incident. The feelings and "atmosphere" (can't think of a better word for it) sound like what you might expect on a ship being attacked by a random missile.

For example:

1. The drawing on p. 7 looks like the superstructure of a warship.

2. The next few pages might describe what it feels like to wonder if your ship is actually under missile attack.

3. On page 10 it records "aircraft--large, multiengined; distant; orbiting; distraction controlled, directed. 'Under orders.'" This USNI article has a little more detail on the AWACS plane detecting the incoming attack: https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2017/j...

There are other similarities, but the CIA report predates the attack, which is especially strange.
noworld
·vor 6 Monaten·discuss
I always thought this was interesting.

May 15, 1987: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00789R0017000...

May 17, 1987: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Stark_incident
noworld
·vor 6 Monaten·discuss
I never noticed that the floor of the BoP appears to be mounted on a shock-absorbing suspension
noworld
·vor 9 Monaten·discuss
[flagged]