HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

ntqvm

no profile record

comments

ntqvm
·letztes Jahr·discuss
Disappointing announcement. M4 brings a significant uplift over M3, and the ST performance of the M3 Ultra will be significantly worse than the M4 Max.

Even for its intended AI audience, the ISA additions in M4 brought significant uplift.

Are they waiting to put M4 Ultra into the Mac Pro?
ntqvm
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
Depends on your definition. If you count video game anti-cheating software as DRM, the answer is yes. Apart from that, I’ve only currently seen TPMs used as a hardware identifier (in the same way a monitor serial is) for software licensing. The capability does exist however.
ntqvm
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
The author seems misinformed about the purpose of TPM to DRM schemes.

The purpose of a TPM, in this case, is not to provide encryption, but instead to provide so-called ‘authenticity’. A TPM with its attestation capabilities can allow a remote validator to attest the operating system and system software you are running via the PCRs which are configured based on it, with Secure Boot preventing tampering. [1] Google tried to implement APIs to plug this into the Chrome browser, which was later abandoned after backlash. [2]

In this case, the TPM can allow services like Netflix or Hulu to validate the hardware and software you are currently running, which provides the base for a hardware DRM implementation as stated in the article. Don’t be surprised if your non-standard OS isn’t allowed to play back content due to its remote validation failing if this is implemented.

TPMs also have a unique, cryptographically verifiable identifier that is burnt into the chip and can be read from software. This allows for essentially a unique ID for each computer that is not able to be forged, as it is signed by the TPM manufacturer (in most cases Intel/AMD as TPMs on consumer hardware are usually emulated on the CPUs TEE). If you were around for the Pentium III serial controversy, this is a very similar issue. It's already used as the primary method of banning users on certain online video games, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see it expand to services requiring it to prove you aren’t a “bot” or similar if it gets wider adoption.

There is a great article going more into detail about the implications of TPM to privacy from several years ago, which was the basis for this reply. [3]

[1]: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/main/articl...

[2]: https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/Web-Environment-In...

[3]: https://secret.club/2021/06/28/windows11-tpms.html
ntqvm
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
According to the Discord, that’s exactly what they did.
ntqvm
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
This exact situation happened with Roblox - they shut down then hired the biggest cheat developers for their game. Kinda funny.
ntqvm
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
They are free to give them the hammer too.
ntqvm
·vor 3 Jahren·discuss
Not particularly relevant due to lawsuits involving game cheating, where the circumstances are very similar.

Beeper is lucky they weren't sued under the DMCA anti-circumvention clause, as they clearly were bypassing the technological measures Apple uses to prevent genuine devices from connecting to iMessage & Apple services.