Tangentially related, I got an androv full-spectrum lamp several years ago for some color work. It was one of the few true "full spectrum" bulbs you can get for cheap which are decently balanced without resorting to use a combination of bulbs. And yes, we tested it with a spectrometer.
Most other full-spectrum lamps I tried at the time on amazon didn't get even close.
If you never tried, working with these lamps is weird: turning it on in the evening or night by mistake _really_ wakes you up.
I'm not sure why people are surprised. Google has been downright evil for quite a while now. They do this in all their products, down to the point of intentionally crippling them.
For instance, since Android 5, the standard contact app doesn't allow you to modify a contact which is not synced with an account. Why even do this? The list of tracking settings that can be turned permanently on, but only temporarily off is ever growing. At some point, you just give up because it's such a silly waste of time. Google knows this very well.
Almost all the google websites, except google search, work badly on anything except chrome. I mean, google groups is rotten already on chrome, but just try it on firefox for the full experience.
Maps (the website) used to be a game-changer in the past. It was insanely fast. Nowdays I hate it. The UI is just horrid. On Firefox it just misbehaves constantly. I only use it for streetview, and still I'm appalled at how badly it has evolved.
They are pushing still impressive libraries and tools. But there's not a single of their products I still like to use.
Thank you for your work. I'm currently a tridactyl user. However I'd like to point out that none of these replacements can currently compete with the previous extensions in term of usability.
Simply put, you cannot count on the keyboard shortcuts to work consistently throughout Firefox. They do not work in built-in pages (such as errors). They do not work when inside an input field in GTK. There's no way to consistently override built-in FF shortcuts that simply get in the way.
It's pretty sad for users which expect the keyboard experience to be consistent. I now mostly use FF's own shortcuts for most of the tab-management actions, since those are the only ones that work most of the time when an error page is generated.
I was under the impression that these automated systems had "reduce personnel" as their primary goal, more than speed.
This would explain why the bad, but still automated, scanning stations still exist.
I've always seen a bagging area just after the scanning station here. I'm not sure it's the same in Japan. But all the people I've seen start to bag while the items are scanned. This results in the cashier waiting for you to pay, blocking people in the line.
With the systems I've discussed in the beginning, you basically bag your items as you go. In the normal case of no-recheck, you pay and leave.
These seems to be linux's own mitigations against L1TF. There's no mention about microcode being updated here, which I assume isn't the case.
I assume the microcode update could be either equal o slightly worse in terms of performance, as the CPU might need to flush more frequently.
Which is pretty sad, as the status of kernel+microcode updates is quite confusing already. Some mitigations can take advantage of new microcode updates, if the kernel is recent enough. How does the pure soft-workaround compare in terms of performance to the microcode-assisted one?
Note that, combining all workarounds for meltdown+spectre-v1/v2+l1tf can have a significant performance hit for some workloads which are not purely cpu-bound. On top of that HT is now looking like a bad idea to start with.
I'm pretty sure that for a server where there's a lot of I/O and virtualization going on, enabling all the patches and workarounds + disabling HT can take a massive cut in overall throughput.
I already did it, and I'm really glad I can do that since I have no use for S0I3 and I'd rather have the extended battery lifetime. However on windows there's no way to disable this sleep mode, and the laptop has consequently lasts way less when put to sleep in Windows 10, even compared to the 3rd edition (which we also have so that I can compare). How does this put linux in power management, huh?
Sadly, the 6th edition of the Carbon also runs waaay hotter than the 3rd, and I did notice occasional coil whine which was previously absent. When running normally the kernel writes regularly about thermal warnings. It seems that power and heat management is not well managed in this edition, and I see similar reports for the x1 yoga 3rd gen.
Linux shines also on low-end laptops as long as you're still decent hardware. Nowdays it's still generally an intel core with integrated graphics, memory and I/O controller, so the result will be pretty much the same. Old, good laptops work even better than brand new editions of current laptop lines.
But this doesn't save you from crappy hardware, which is why this kind of argument is a non-starter for me. How well does current windows editions work on low-end crappy laptops that sell for the lowest tier? Not great. These laptops have plenty of little issues on windows as well.
Maybe better than linux, because the drivers have way more work-arounds than linux has.
Have you ever seen the internal linux quirks table to work around buggy and downright horrid hardware? That's what you get with those. If it works at all is thanks to the patience of people that put in the time to work those issues around. I frankly do not blame linux if it doesn't work well with such hardware.
How can you compare two different laptops? I'm comparing windows and linux on the same laptop.
I personally use debian unstable with a tiling window manager (awesomewm) without a specific DE. However, I generally setup Mint for all my colleagues on the same laptop lines, and there's one colleague running Arch. We all have very similar battery lifetimes.
Sure, however I really like to see what downvoters have to say. The "power management is bad" is pretty generic, isn't it?
High-end laptop lines (Dell, HP, Lenovo) have actually pretty good linux support, they are almost always intel i5+ cpus with integrated graphics which are all very similar. There is next to zero setup required in almost any case. This is known. The drivers are tried and tested. I've never experienced any random "power management issue". Suspend/resume/battery consumption/acpi is working perfectly fine. What else does qualify for "power managment"??
I've been supporting a team of 20+ people with these lines in a mixed environment, and linux since more than a decade was always basically plug and play.
There have been some quirks in some models, which generally required some tweaks in the kernel boot line, to fix issues with backlight tweaking.
As others have pointed out, I've used two kinds of self-checkout mechanisms in grocery stores (France).
The mechanism in as shown in the article (bring all the bags to the check-out lane, scan, weight, pay) is just horrid, and way slower. I just go to the regular checkout in these cases. I've seen a store which replaced all regular queues with self-checkout lanes, and now I just avoid it.
The second method is by taking a barcode gun with you at the entrance, scan the items as you go, and simply pay at the exit. There are random-rechecks, but they are performed by the cashier, so they're quick. On average, it's actually faster, and I do prefer this method. The barcode scanner takes the tally for you and can do a price check, which is another convenience to have sometimes.
Every store I've seen using this tech was from Siemens and I'm pretty happy about the implementation.
This is a blatant lie that needs to stop. I've been using linux exclusively on laptops for more than 10 years. The first 5 with the HP EliteBook like, currently with Lenovo X1 line.
On my current X1 Yoga 1st gen, I do regularly get almost 1.5x the uptime on battery compared to windows 10.
We got a batch of X1 Carbon 6th gen, which are "optimized for windows 10", where the S3 sleep state was replaced by the S0I3, which is OS-assisted. The X1 Yoga with S3 can both suspend and resume faster than windows 10, despite not having S0I3 (and has longer battery lifetime to booth).
And by fast I mean that by the time the lid is up, the OS is ready. By contrast, windows 10 seems to always shuffle for several seconds after resume, even on the carbon 6th gen.
RawTherapee has the option to use the system theme, and I'm quite grateful for that.
darktable on the other hand has basically one dark theme only which also shows stupid UI mistakes as black-overscroll-on-black-background in all lists and fixed font size. If there is ONE setting you have to keep, is the FONT SIZE in the system theme!
You're excluding many more issues from here. Click on a scollbar and drag outside: very often the scrollbar doesn't release when the mouse button is depressed, though styling and custom events play a role. QML is not immune to a lot of quirks in highdpi, most of which are completely absent in QtWidgets. In detail, font rendering (hinting) in QML in GL contextes is basically broken.
The whole UI is perceptibly laggier as a whole. I'm a programmer myself. As a programmer I feel ambivalent, but as an user, I hate it.
Every QML application I've tried was comparable to Electron in my eyes so far: slow and full of little usability bugs.
This started to be really noticeable for me in the linux world, where QT is already common, but more and more UIs are converted to QML from QtWidgets.
The difference is staggering for me. QML GUIs are also often styled by the authors, which very often break or replace the system theme, something I hate.