HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

sagyam

no profile record

Submissions

Donut Labs Drops High Temperature Performance Report [pdf]

pub-4515714b5b4743f58cf78e0f2d2548da.r2.dev
4 points·by sagyam·vor 4 Monaten·4 comments

VTT Test Donut Lab Battery Reaches 80% Charge in Under 10 Minutes [pdf]

pub-fee113bb711e441db5c353d2d31abbb3.r2.dev
114 points·by sagyam·vor 5 Monaten·122 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by sagyam·vor 6 Monaten·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by sagyam·vor 6 Monaten·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by sagyam·vor 9 Monaten·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by sagyam·vor 10 Monaten·0 comments

comments

sagyam
·vor 4 Monaten·discuss
Yep given the weekly drip feed of information and charging fingerprint matching a high-end NMC battery. I am finding this more and more sus. It's probably a very high end expensive battery but not the miracle that was promised in CES.
sagyam
·vor 4 Monaten·discuss
Donut Lab drops another VTT report this time focused on High Temperature Performance Here is the TLDR:

The Battery & Test Setup

   - Cell tested: Donut Lab "Solid-State Battery V1" – a pouch cell labeled DL2
   - Nominal specs: 26 Ah capacity, 3.6V nominal voltage, 94 Wh energy
   - Tested by: Independent third-party lab (VTT) at customer request
   - Test equipment: PEC ACT0550 cell tester + Weiss climate chamber capable of -40°C to +180°C
Performance Results

   - Actual capacity measured: 24.9 Ah (slightly below 26 Ah nominal, but within reasonable variance)
    - +80°C discharge: Delivered 110.5% of room-temperature capacity (27.48 Ah vs 24.87 Ah at 24A)
    - +100°C discharge: Delivered 107.1% of room-temperature capacity (27.61 Ah at 12A)
    - Energy efficiency: ~89-90% round-trip efficiency observed
    - Charging: All charging performed at +20°C for safety; cell accepted charge normally after both high-temp tests
Physical Observations

    Cell used a 2.4kg steel plate on top for mechanical pressure during testing
    Post-100°C test: Cell pouch lost vacuum (visible inflation/deflation) but remained electrically functional
    No visible damage after 80°C test; cell appeared physically intact after 100°C test despite vacuum loss
Missing claims

    Energy density: No weight and volume was mentioned

    Cycle life: VTT ran only 3 test cycles total.

    Cost Claims: Nothing about cost is mentioned

    Material Claims: No chemical analysis or materials analysis.

    No abuse testing: No nail penetration, no overcharge, no short-circuit, no crush tests.
Company has said next report will drop next monday i.e. March 9th
sagyam
·vor 5 Monaten·discuss
First report for Donut lab battery is out. Here is the TLDR

Specs

    26 Ah nominal capacity at 1C discharge rate

    94 Wh nominal energy with 3.6V nominal voltage

    Operates within 2.7V – 4.15V recommended range (max charging to 4.3V)
What was verified

    5C charging (130A): 0-80% in ~9.5 minutes, 0-100% in ~13.5 minutes

    11C charging (286A): 0-80% in ~4.9 minutes, 0-100% in ~7.3 minutes

    Successfully delivered 98.4-99.6% of charged capacity even after extreme 11C charging
Thermal Management

    Tested with both one-sided and two-sided heat sinks to simulate real-world conditions

    With dual heat sinks: Peak temps of 47°C (5C) and 63°C (11C) — well within safe limits

    With single heat sink: Reached 61.5°C (5C) and up to 89°C (11C) — still functional but approaching thermal limit
Missing claims

    Energy density: No weight and volume was mentioned

    Cycle life: VTT ran only 7 test cycles total.

    Cost Claims: Nothing about cost is mentioned

    Material Claims: No chemical analysis or materials analysis.

    Extreme Temperature Performance: No cold weather testing. No high-temperature testing.

    No abuse testing: No nail penetration, no overcharge, no short-circuit, no crush tests.
But according to the company website another report will drop next monday (March 2nd).
sagyam
·vor 6 Monaten·discuss
I built a small web tool that generates a single install command for multiple Linux applications. You select apps and a distribution (Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch, etc.), and it outputs grouped commands for APT, DNF, Pacman, Flatpak, Snap, and AUR, including setup steps when needed.
sagyam
·vor 6 Monaten·discuss
I built a small web tool that generates a single install command for multiple Linux applications. You select apps and a distribution (Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch, etc.), and it outputs grouped commands for APT, DNF, Pacman, Flatpak, Snap, and AUR, including setup steps when needed.

Inspired by the friction of repeatedly setting up fresh Linux machines.
sagyam
·vor 9 Monaten·discuss
Hi guys, after your feedback from last time, I have turned my simple storage cost calculator into a financial cost modeling tool. I have made every effort to include all types of costs involved. Do you think I have missed something? I would love to hear your thoughts on it.
sagyam
·vor 9 Monaten·discuss
I have read and watched these articles and videos where people seem to have a problem with Microservice, Kubernetes, cloud providers, or anything that's not a PHP server sitting behind an nginx running on a $5 VPS. I have also seen the front-end analogy of these types of posts, where anything that is not written using HTML, CSS, and jQuery is unnecessary bloat. I will soon write a blog, which I think will cover more points and nuances of both sides. For now, here are some of my scattered thoughts.

- If deploying your MVP to EKS is overengineering, then signing a year-long lease for bare metal is hubris. Both think one day they will need it, but only one of them can undo that decision.

- Don't compare your JBOD to a multi-region replicated, CDN-enabled object store that can shrug off a DDoS attack. One protects you from those egress fees, and the other protects you from a disaster. They are not comparable.

- A year from now, the startup you work for may not exist. Being able to write that you have experience with that trendy technology on your resume sure sounds nice. Given the layoffs we are seeing right now, putting our interest above the company's may be a good idea.

- Yes, everyone knows modern CPUs are very fast, and paying $300/mo for an 8-core machine feels like a ripoff, but unless you are business of renting GPUs and selling tokens. Compute was never your cost center; it was always humans. For some companies, not being able to meet your SLA due to talent attrition is scarier than the cloud bill.

I know these are one-sided arguments, and I said I would cover both sides with more nuance. I need some time to think through all the arguments, especially on the frontend side. I will soon write a blog.
sagyam
·vor 10 Monaten·discuss
Most cloud pricing calculators online are built by a cloud provider or storage server seller. As a result, they are too simplistic and always show their option as the cheapest. I have built an actual pricing calculator that takes into account every single variable to give you a detailed yearly breakdown for both scenarios.

You will be surprised to learn that once you start accounting for different variables, on-premises may not always be the cheapest option.

Features: • Comprehensive cost analysis over 1-30 years • Hardware, software, power, bandwidth breakdowns • Real-time cost projections with growth factors • Interactive charts & detailed comparisons • Export-ready financial models