HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

smarx

no profile record

Submissions

[untitled]

1 points·by smarx·vor 2 Jahren·0 comments

Post mortem on Linear incident from Jan 24th, 2024

linear.app
3 points·by smarx·vor 2 Jahren·0 comments

Dynamic Programming Is Easy

smarx.com
2 points·by smarx·vor 3 Jahren·0 comments

Hi, My Name Is Keyboard

github.com
3 points·by smarx·vor 3 Jahren·0 comments

ASCII protocol buffers as config files

rachelbythebay.com
2 points·by smarx·vor 3 Jahren·2 comments

DALL-E 2 has a secret language

twitter.com
619 points·by smarx·vor 4 Jahren·112 comments

comments

smarx
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
I think it's Kernighan, actually: https://www.laws-of-software.com/laws/kernighan/.
smarx
·vor 3 Jahren·discuss
The ship has sailed on this term of art, but as a native English speaker, I agree with you that it's ungrammatical. I would use a hyphen, though: "physics-based." This answer agrees with you (and me): https://english.stackexchange.com/a/428679.

Here's one way to think about _why_ it sounds wrong. "Physically based" would mean that "physically" is the answer to the question "How is it based?" To a native English speaker, that question sounds odd. A more natural question is "What is it based on?" To answer that question, you need a noun: "It's based on physics." Hence the construct "physics-based," like "evidence-based medicine" or "merit-based scholarships."
smarx
·vor 4 Jahren·discuss
I believe you failed the CAPTCHA. I assume the bottom right is the only correct answer.