I disagree. With a high sex drive, it's probable that I would reproduce eventually, risking passing on my genes. Suicide ensures that procreation won't occur.
This isn't occurring st some subset of stages; it's been steady throughout my entire life. And I've grown more and more cynical with age. It's a decision that I've long intellectualized.
People who don't survive aren't around anymore to discuss whether they are satisfied with their decision. Why would I waste my time talking to someone who intends to talk me out of something that isn't a debate to me? It's a personal decision.
This reminds me of my core mission: sterilize myself or self terminate.
Everything I've experienced and felt since youth indicates that my seed is unwanted by humanity, and it's clear suicide helps evolution by eliminating bad genes. I think about suicide constantly and have done so since youth. This is my brain telling me to help humanity by leaving. Hoping to complete that mission ASAP.
In a situation like this it's safer to say that your profile is safe only if that specific identity is on a white list of known safe identities. Thus things like test will by default, Show as unsafe which is better because it hides information about who is unsafe. If designed right, random form data will simply return unsafe silently. Maybe you could try testing for that.
Paying out anonymous folks that demand ransom of copyable data is futile. There won't be incentive to not leverage the data even if the ransom were to be paid.
The reality is that BTC helps to facilitate various criminal behavior, some of which would not exist otherwise.
If 4100 were to break today, there would be greatly increased probability of accelerated downside. This is deserved since BTC is leveraged by criminals such as in this case. Don't be surprised if this ends up becoming the case as a form of public penalization of such criminal behavior.
No, another cryptocurrency (the word crypto is already used to mean something else) can gain steam while the price of BTC goes sideways or down, and eventually win. Just saying the statement "no matter what happens" is false.
Wouldn't it be better to ask if his position is any different, now that he has had time to research the topic? It would be helpful if you could provide material info to Mr. Schiller that he does not have, beyond the ICO revelation, so he can re-assess. You clearly have important info that he could use.
Someone eventually is going to build an app framework that offers clean reusable abstractions for micro services in the context of a further-abstracted orchestrated and containerized provider-agnostic automatically highly available and scalable infrastructure, complete with backup, security, log analysis, and all open source and installable through a single remotely executable shell script.
The short 5k-5.5k idea could be a bust anyway; maybe we do rally to 6k from here. I am concerned with managing risk, less so with any particular idea itself. That's why I thought it was funny that another posted how I was "very wrong" about how I described volatility. Who cares who is right or wrong? It doesn't matter. Just be safe, that's all that matters. Protect capital.
Sorry meant nothing has risen from a fraction of a penny to five grand in human history, iow referring to the percentage moves that we may never see again in our lifetimes. I stand corrected. Meant relative to any other investment in history.