Well, the lefties just realized it was satire, so they memoryholed my original comment. As long as they thought I was being serious they upvoted like crazy.
I hope I still, before I'm banned, managed to demonstrate that it is nigh impossible to tell the difference between the most extreme satirical absurdly totalitarian opinion, and actual "progressive" thought these days. And now they have both chambers.
The thing that I find most terrifying about Trump is that he persued every legal option to win, and when that didn't work out he conceded and said he's going to help make sure there's a smooth transition of power.
He is truly the most vile authoritarian anywhere outside of the 1930s Germany, and that's not just because he makes jokes.
At the very least we should require that people learn the basic tenets of modern science: that war is peace, slavery is freedom and ignorance is power. That would go a long way towards curbing extremism.
This is a very good idea, and the measurement of success in these important educational efforts must be: "after this mandatory education that teaches you critical thinking and how to not just be obedient, do you now finally have the correct opionions?"
If the student doesn't, he/she/xir should be deplatformed for life.
protip: they never actually believed anything they were saying, they just want to use the opportunity to criminalize and ban their political opposition
No, I completely understand that, but like I wrote, evidence of any form of inciting violence is enough, I just need something to point to to stop people from falsely claiming that people on the left are lying about their reasons for banning orange Hitler
I'm trying to collect a list evidence on the criminal Trump to have something you can quickly point when refuting confused idiot relatives who support him, but I have not been able to follow everything that has been happening for the past few days, for various reasons.
Would you please provide a link to ex-president Trump inciting violence like ISIS? Lesser forms of agitation for violence is fine too.
Only insane far-right conspiracy theorists think about Epstein or Maxwell. If you listen to even a tiny bit of what they're spouting, you immediately see that it's complete nonsense. Therefor it is very important that they are not allowed to poison the debate and spread their dangerous lunacy.
And thankfully, the new algorithm will be able to quickly identify the perpetrators who spread those insane conspiracy theories so they can be Epsteined as well
> Without pulling up sources it's on his second paragraph of his wikipedia page, which tends to avoid conspiracies etc.
Slightly off topic, but I'm so happy wikipedia has finally stepped up an gotten rid of the stupid conspiracy theories that used to ruin their articles in the past because they turned a blind eye to the racist patriarchy of old white men that oppresses the working class and minorities.
> I think this is a slight perversion of the truth. A union that relies entirely on industrial action (a.k.a. strikes) to get a company to change, isn't a good union. If a union walks into every negotiation with just an ultimatum, then very quickly the otherside is going to get fed up of their bullshit.
If those unionized googlers are worth their salt, can't they use more aggressive negotiation tactics, at least like a DDOS?
I can't wait until this technology is perfected so that we can finally put an end to online disinformation for good.
Those dangerous idiots actually believe that a billionare pedophile spent decades inviting high-ranking politicians and influential decision makers to his private island for orgies with underage girls, and that when he was arrested he managed to hang himself while on suicide watch in a maximum security prison! They really are that deluded and dangerous. This needs to end, now.
The nutcases also believe that the governments are working with big tech to eliminate cash so that anybody who doesn't toe the line can be "permanently cancelled". Have you ever heard anything so ridiculous? I hope in the future we can just have an algorithm that disables the bank account of anybody who spews such divisive nonsense online. There is no place for that kind of hate in a society that strives for any kind of progress.
I hope I still, before I'm banned, managed to demonstrate that it is nigh impossible to tell the difference between the most extreme satirical absurdly totalitarian opinion, and actual "progressive" thought these days. And now they have both chambers.