I find that this comment reduces humans to elaborate Markov chains and then uses that misconception to make a point.
Many of humanity's best works (paintings, classical music, golden age of physics) have been created before humans voluntarily reduced themselves to automata.
AI hasn't produced anything apart from mashing together other people's creations, usually with a somewhat creepy result.
In programming this may work because quality does not matter, only LOC and social capital with the rest of the brogrammers. The objection that therefore real programmers do not have to be afraid is false. They either have to join the mediocrity or clean up the mess that the brogrammers make (while being disrespected by them of course).
Many of humanity's best works (paintings, classical music, golden age of physics) have been created before humans voluntarily reduced themselves to automata.
AI hasn't produced anything apart from mashing together other people's creations, usually with a somewhat creepy result.
In programming this may work because quality does not matter, only LOC and social capital with the rest of the brogrammers. The objection that therefore real programmers do not have to be afraid is false. They either have to join the mediocrity or clean up the mess that the brogrammers make (while being disrespected by them of course).