Passing a law to shoot the homeless people on first sight will clear it up real quick.
Really sick people can be put to medical prison camps where we make them to grow oraginc food food (charging tech companies cafeterias billions) or perform miracle drug testing (charging big pharma billions) on them.
We can recruit Americans (Using first amendment for the rescue) with gun for this task based on volunteering.
Then the community does not value you untill you achieve success in the said profession. So it's very risky. Most guys don't choose it because then you've to hide in all family gatherings....
>Because who in their right mind wants to sacrifice 16 years of earning potential, take on 500K of debt only to become an MD with long work days and now prices that are fixed with no other form of negotiation leverage in sight.
Asians/Indians make most MDs in the US because being a doctor is valued a lot in their communities even if you've infinite debt, you still get respect.
Second, most doctors come from doctor families. They've already transversed the path once, and their kids can reuse the knowledge and connections.
So yea, my father is MD and he can easily support 16 years of MD education for me. If you don't have a family with similar resources, obviously either you can take debt which comes with enourmose stress/worries which decrease your chance to complete or not compete at all!
Individualistic people aren't going to find it easier to compete with community backed people.
>In Germany for instance higher education is free everywhere, I don't see how this could work with private fundraising.
Germany isn't a good example. Germany stands because it can exploit its weaker neighbors, the east block out of their resources and force the companies to book profit and get taxed in Germany.
Germans see each others as bothers. Show me a few German companies where a foreigner is in the executive role?
The whole point of Germany is Germans first. Ofcourse, they can make education free in this setting.
> Perhaps we can start treating addiction like a disease and not a moral failing?
My friend who died from heroine overdose.
Here is his story, my friend got banned from online forums. In his opinion, he was banned for posting political rants. And moderator told him, do not do this here. So, he felt is not accepted in the community and got addicited to heroine.
These days, some moderators think they are lords of the universe and ban anyone like a robot.
It's failure of the soceity in part of his personal failure.
I started smoking Cannabis. It has helped me a lot after long programming session.
My mind used to keep racing. I tried everything from playing instrument to swimming but nothing helped.
I would get the flashback of the diagrams, communication, tickets and emails. I would continuously think about the data structure and algorithms, reaearch a lot of them and figure out which one would be most efficient for my employer. I would work out the complexity and implementation in my head. Once i got into accident when thinking about a bug.
But now it's solved after i started taking cannabis.
> My code is better, I'm healthier, and I get more done per working minute.
It's not about what you are. What market asks is, are you better than others who you can be replaced with? The ones who are ready to scarifice themselves, their health and deliver more code then you. Let's not pretend that his worries are unfounded.
Really sick people can be put to medical prison camps where we make them to grow oraginc food food (charging tech companies cafeterias billions) or perform miracle drug testing (charging big pharma billions) on them.
We can recruit Americans (Using first amendment for the rescue) with gun for this task based on volunteering.
It will cost very less.