I’ve read through parts of the Wikipedia page several times in the past. It’s not ideal. I haven’t studied music theory systematically but I believe all the modes that contain a minor third above the root are technically considered minor scales (so Dorian, Aeolian, Phrygian, and Locrian), but in addition to that there are of course other constructed scales like melodic minor and harmonic minor as you mention, as well as multiple different scales called the Blues minor scale (the only one I’m familiar with is the one constructed from the minor pentatonic plus a diminished fifth).
This “law” was never really reasonable or sensible.
I’ve been working on optimizing compiler backends for nearly 30 years. The reality is that you hit a wall of diminishing returns pretty quickly, within say 5-20 person-years of effort (so a small team working for say 3-5 years).
You also relatively quickly get to the point where heuristics matter very much and all you do is generate new S-curves as you make changes. Meaning that every change speeds some workloads up, and slows others down.
Disciplined compiler writers will follow the old adage that an optimization needs to pay for itself, meaning that you don’t add things that slow down compilation without improving that S-curve by a relatively comparable amount.
What we get with LLVM is a large number of people tossing in the things that help the handful of workloads they are currently working on, with limited oversight regarding how that’s impacting compile-time for everyone else. So the compiler gets slower and slower, the compiled code doesn’t get much faster, and overall the compiler grows and grows in complexity.
This is why I’m personally a lot more excited about working on small manageable compiler code bases rather than large monolithic ones that try to be everything to everyone.
I don't think they have a choice either way, but you're right, and I have a friend who recently did this, but not between Apple and Meta.
He was working at another well-known tech company that is suffering from a brain drain and he was getting a lot of exposure (including in the press). They gave him a seven figure retention bonus in RSUs, and he used that to get around the same from a competitor where he felt he would have better long-term prospects. Overall his yearly expected comp went up by about 50%, and should be around $750k-$900k at this point.
Sorry I cannot tell what “this” is since that article neither mentions downplaying grades or interviewing students.
I believe the specific things I am talking about were discussed in relation to introversion and The Ivy’s specifically wanting to lean toward extroverts who were well-rounded and had good social skills.
Invest the money in relatively stable/safe investments. Some real estate, index funds, etc.
Leave yourself enough for a year or so, and take that time to figure out what you’d really like to do without putting too much pressure on yourself on a daily basis. Spend that time focusing on doing healthy activities, socializing, reading in areas that you aren’t that familiar, etc. I don’t know if it’s an option, but if you could withdraw from school with the option to return at a later date that might be a good idea if you’re not finding the motivation at the moment.
Sorry, but I don’t think your idea of meritocracy is very much in line with what most Universities are looking for.
That’s why they have things like essays and consider extracurricular activities. Most of the selective Universities specifically exclude people with high grades and very little else that they were involved in.
Moreover, I recall reading at some point that at least some of the Ivy’s, during at least the first half of the 20th century, specifically avoided students with the highest grades in favor of those who were more like a B+ average and were more social, which they determined through the very subjective means of interviewing students on campus. (I’m old enough that I recall some of my friends visiting Universities for such meetings, but I have no idea if they still meet prospective students like this).
I was going to make the same point, more generally about electronic music gear.
People greatly favor knob-per-function and minimal menu diving. Having some kind of screen and minimal menus for rarely used features is fine, too, but anything that’s about playability and something you want to tweak in real time needs a knob or slider interface.
To be very contrarian and sound like a bit of a neo-Luddite, I have been a photographer for more than 30 years and have never taken photographs as good as the ones I take with my Leicas, which are the most feature-poor expensive cameras you’re likely to find.
No auto-focus, no video, limited feature light metering, etc.
I drooled over getting a Leica M for 15 years and finally took the plunge about five years ago. Best choice I have made gear-wise in all this time. After getting the first, I went ahead and got the Monochrom as well (yes, B&W-only sensor).
Interviewed there a few years back. This was right after one of the many Facebook crises became public (sorry, forget which). I wasn’t super interested in the role or working there but was interested in seeing what an offer might look like.
One of the interviewers was clearly going through a crises of conscience and told me he was thinking of leaving. All of the interviewers made it clear they didn’t personally use the product. Definitely the strangest interview of my life.
Interestingly, Monk’s own version of Caravan from “Thelonious Monk Plays Duke Ellington” was also derided by many critics (well the album as a whole, really), but it’s one of my favorite versions of that tune, and I think more people have come to appreciate that album over time.
This is true in the US as well, at least where I live. Judges specifically inform the jury that they cannot treat a police officer’s testimony with any more weight or as any more correct than any other witness.
Whether juries actually pay attention to this or not I cannot say.
If you bought a PC-compatible clone in the 80s you had a good chance of being able to find documentation of some kind to tell you about how pieces of the hardware itself worked.
Not at all the case for other kinds of hardware, or any software.
Companies being required to release documentation would increase the cost of development (passed on to the consumer) by a non-trivial amount.
As it is, people inside companies usually cannot get good documentation for the things the company develops that they need to interface with. Been there, seen that. It’s unfortunate, because that can also increase costs, but usually people just muddle through with poor documentation and many email chains to ask questions about the things that are poorly documented.
Also like the K3, but not nearly as much.
I have the medium-clicky keys on the K2.