It strikes me that this is a kind of an escalating pattern though I don't suppose it has to be. Clock -> Steam Engine -> Computer -> AGI -> Skynet -> Throw rocks at robots -> Judgement Day. Also very not serious commentary.
On I suppose a slightly more serious note it also strikes me that there will eventually, probably, maybe be _something_ that fits best; though we are not promised to find it. And it seems wild to say that about a model because all models are fundamentally wrong, but they are usually group-able by less-wrongness, so probably fundamentally feasible.
If reputations have generally stayed constant, thedailymail is the connection. Maybe somewhere around the nexus of TMZ in their own special ways, imo.
* edit: I honestly didn't even bother to dig out the name of the bacteria because I figured it wasn't there or wrong and I'll make the chatbot struggle through it later.
Works for me in mobile Firefox on Android with ublock origin and umatrix. Everything loads and I can make the little robot do backflips and stuff. And I usually get WebGL issues with this set even before the plugins come into play.
I have to wonder if they modded it because this doesn't seem possible anymore. Though I may be holding the putter wrong XD
I tried hitting the little floating island behind the start too to get a bounce but the ball clips through it.
What I did find was that you can use the purple spinning circle at the beginning as a teleporter to the one near the end if you aim at the wall opposite the spinner. Your ball will hit the wall and bounce back and up into the teleporter thing.
With the client code being open source, everybody can build the client themselves, run it locally and verify that the open source code is being used. If we published the server code open source, this would not be the case: No one would be able to verify that the open source server code is actually running on our server - so publishing it is a bit pointless.
- Tuta
So we continue in the reality where Tuta runs code on their sever and it is a mystery. It could be an amazing application. It could be a cellular automata that runs an email server.
I think I might start calling these organic tech. Because they take a word we know, "open source", and then use it like the food companies used "organic" stickers.
Not sure about sockets but I've seen a company with a wafer sized TPU thing or whatever. They claim to have an approach to route around the defects and I had to scroll past some press release I didn't read about the stock market, so someone believes in them I guess. They sell a mini-fridge that can handle a model with trillions of parameters with a contact sales button. Cerberas is their name. I actually ended up misremembering the name name of Taalas as Cerberas and discovered them when I was researching the above comment. Taalas burns models to chips. Cerberas makes pizza sized chips.
I've seen Taalas come up on HN, but only once. I'm not a HN fanatic but I end up around page 3 before I kill-filp my browser into oblivion. Currently Taalas has Llama 3.1 8B burned onto a chip and offer chatbot and API access. That said they aren't selling the chips yet, on their website at least.
I expect they are waiting for an openweight model they really feel is worth burning to a chip and/or training their own thing. I'd guess they could probably figure out some efficiency speedups if they are doing model development + hardware development at the same time. Though this seems different than Google and friends with their TPUs and similar. TPUs being general purpose chips than what Taalas is making. Still, probably something there.
Probably worth mentioning that I just did a very informal and quick review of identity/age verification providers because of payment provider requirements. Yoti came up as one of the more privacy focused (relatively) lower friction options because they only require a face scan and try to estimate age based on that. They may do more but that is as far as my research got.
Technologies: Python (Scripts, Flask, a little Django), PostgreSQL, HTML/CSS, JavaScript, PHP (in the long ago times), implementing AI stuff, QA, Information Security, Human Communication
Kind, humble, software developer seeking same. Willing to take on contract work, full time preferred. Tech stacks don't match? Give me a month or less and I'll learn it. Send me your Nintendo friend code if you want to play Diablo III.
On I suppose a slightly more serious note it also strikes me that there will eventually, probably, maybe be _something_ that fits best; though we are not promised to find it. And it seems wild to say that about a model because all models are fundamentally wrong, but they are usually group-able by less-wrongness, so probably fundamentally feasible.