Calling someone a "fucking idiot" is far kinder than falsely accusing them of being a LLM poster, but I don't even see a flag on the comment which I was replying to.
Do you just have a preference for better disguised insults?
>It also looks like you've been using multiple accounts to comment in the same threads, which is abusive and not allowed.
maybe don't build systems that only serve to encourage behaviour which you would seemingly prefer to discourage?
Ah yes, because businesses just love to turn down free money.
>Once again, nobody is asking that. So you are misunderstanding SKG.
If SKG really does not want games to remain playable after EOL, they're certainly piss-poor communicators. I thought the whole point was to "stop killing games", i.e. make them last longer.
>> You're suggesting a subsidy for gamers which everyone else would to pay for
>No, that's not how it works. Not even close.
As far as I can tell, legislation which enables you to play a game in perpetuity instead of for a limited time will likely reduce the amount of tax revenue your gaming-related activities generate.
A useful metric to focus on here is the cost per hour of entertainment. The price of the game itself might stay the same, but the cost of your gaming itself would be subsidized.
Maybe look at how people actually use it? Not sure why the Indian blogspam is worth looking at.
"Engagement" has a specific meaning. It's different from "like farming" or "karma farming". Some platforms specifically reward engagement, making it a reasonable thing to farm on those platforms.
> using automated systems for mass liking or following
Clearly the author was clueless, this has nothing whatsoever to do with engagement farming.
> There is no guarantee that they will be a big part of the stock market. It is not "absolutely" sure, for them or for any new public stock
It's really hard to believe that you'd be writing this in good faith.
In reality, even without being publicly listed(!), these companies have already managed to become an absolutely massive part of the market. After the IPO? Hah.
Do you just have a preference for better disguised insults?
>It also looks like you've been using multiple accounts to comment in the same threads, which is abusive and not allowed.
maybe don't build systems that only serve to encourage behaviour which you would seemingly prefer to discourage?