HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

wills_forward

no profile record

Submissions

Transformer by Hand in Excel

twitter.com
2 points·by wills_forward·vor 2 Jahren·0 comments

Tool to transcode videos in nothing but a browser

rgbcu.be
2 points·by wills_forward·vor 2 Jahren·0 comments

Satellite internet has quickly changed life in Alaska

adn.com
5 points·by wills_forward·vor 2 Jahren·2 comments

Three week satellite time-lapse video of earth

youtube.com
3 points·by wills_forward·vor 2 Jahren·0 comments

comments

wills_forward
·vor 25 Tagen·discuss
neat
wills_forward
·vor 2 Monaten·discuss
There's a lot of opportunity in being the manager who can still see it
wills_forward
·vor 7 Monaten·discuss
Why not use both? I just built a pipeline for document data extraction that uses PaddleOCR, then Gemini 3 to check + fix errors. It gets close to 99.9% on extraction from financial statements finally on par with humans.
wills_forward
·vor 10 Monaten·discuss
https://x.com/whowillrickwill/status/1920723985311903767
wills_forward
·vor 10 Monaten·discuss
The cheap easy take: it's tragically ironic that the software running the infrastructure in Silicon Valley is such a problem
wills_forward
·letztes Jahr·discuss
So this could universally decrease the memory requirements by un-quantitized LLMs by 30%? Seems big if true.
wills_forward
·letztes Jahr·discuss
This paper is basically statistical mechanics with a quantum veneer. Two major issues:

1. Scale: They're simulating just 13 qubits with QuTiP and making grand claims about quantum thermodynamics. The computational complexity they're glossing over here is astronomical. Anyone who's actually worked with quantum systems knows you can't just handwave away the scaling problems.

2. Measurement Problem: Their whole argument about instantaneous vs time-averaged measurements is just repackaging the quantum measurement problem without actually solving anything. They're doing the same philosophical shell game that every "breakthrough" quantum paper does by moving around where they put the observer and pretending they've discovered something profound.
wills_forward
·vor 2 Jahren·discuss
It was funny to hear the same guy warning LMMs were getting too powerful now talking about the limits of available original training data.