The screenshot of ol' claude closed code with that ascii table tells it all: Vapor AIware.
As if it really would work like that.
The noise added by the verbosity alone is not taken care of enough, and this entire thing belongs on the great pile of ai vaporware.
I agree. This isn't what people struggle with to be honest.
With the limitations, right now it is sloppy unfortunately...
Yet cool to release it nontheless.
This entire steganographically marking feature is prolly vibecoded like everything regarding claude code.
They can try sure, but classic cat and mice game dictates: thankfully the chinese WILL keep distilling.
The simple fact that people will act on it and believe just because what they insinuated as a prompt and the answer being churned out on the screen looking somewhat readable.
That alone was going to seed so much discord and reinforce invalid messages, truly "oh shit".
DeepSeek rules. I'm using it to do stuff that's not too big in scope, because I still need to remain in charge. Even for this, western competitors have no chance, least Anthropic and OpenAI, plus Gemini also has gotten too expensive besides flash (which is arguably just great, too).
With this, I am sticking to deepseek-v4-pro entirely.
I don't buy it. A lot of stuff this finds is also just simply wrong, benignly reported as true, despite upper/lower layers in the code burying the possibility of a vulnerability actually being exploited.
It's a performance/security trade-off too, it always has been. Additional checks and other measures do in fact need to be performed for security purposes.
Great marketing as always, but the rose-tinted view many have seems vicariously misplaced.
You are absolutely right!
Kidding, but the analogy sits comfortably with me.
I wonder though if this kind of behavior is potentially harmful, most likely less than drugs but nonetheless...
"The signal is not just stable. It also has high capacity."
stopped reading right there
also it's nothing that anybody using tails for example should have to worry about.
Nothingburger.
depending how hard the "the brain is a muscle" saying applies, there is no way using LLMs/chatbot systems/AI is not going to deteriorate your brain immensely.
As if it really would work like that. The noise added by the verbosity alone is not taken care of enough, and this entire thing belongs on the great pile of ai vaporware.