And if it wouldn’t have tried manipulating my emotions and gain access to my attention center, there were a chance that I would have read the article. Now I won’t, as the article apparently isn’t interesting on its own merits.
It doesn’t have to do with military neutrality.
The sentence implies that Switzerland due to their neutral status never or almost never agree to sanctions of any kind.
However their neutral status has never been an indication of that. It clearly reads as sanctions despite historical neutrality.
Either this is an entertainment piece and they can write it how they want (but it shouldn’t be mentioned on a wiki page) or it’s a news piece and should be without these kind of “suggestive but not exactly saying it” articles that blur the line between non-news and deniability thereof.
The only thing it would have cost them to not mention Switzerland’s neutrality would be clicks/money. 0% truth would have been lost writing the context properly.
This appears to me like a completely normal and legitimate copyright takedown notice because you reuploaded their YouTube video without permission? Or am I missing something?
If you wanted to advertise their video you should have linked the YouTube video (assuming that you reuploaded it yourself on Reddit instead).
You were costing them ad revenue.
I don’t really see any connection to NFT’s.
Edit: The original creator of the video literally commented on your Reddit post. You did in fact just rip his video. The time writing this article would have been better spent looking into copyright law for beginners. But tbh looking at the buzzwords in the title and the fact the creator commented on your post days ago it seems to me that you are simply not done milking their content yet and trying it with a blog post now.
For all we know (as the OP doesn’t mention trying incognito) the OP could have malicious software on their device that hijacks their browser to manipulate search results
Been lurking on hn for a year now, finally made an account because I can give some value with a comment
Youtube content creators can choose where to put the ads themselves. You will come across many videos with only the first ad or the ads set sparely in the video, some even put the ads in breaks.
You can also chose to let YouTube put the ads but that’s also a one and done, one setting per video. I can confirm though that YouTube, on the automated setting, put way more ads in the past year or two than before.
I think at that time YouTube used to take the frame in the center of the video but I’m not so sure about that one.