I am glad to read this article which poke around the idea of "Pixel Perfection", for me that is indeed time-wasted, and I don't know why there are lots of company keeps saying they want this kind of "Perfection".
But I do believe people care quality, what they did is comparing the quality with price, Netflix is a bad example since it's so cheap (compared to seeing movie or a show in theater). The viewer saw a bad movie they will just think, oh well, I don't care.
I think this article treat result as the resaon, company didn't incentivize the "Glue work" is not purely they don't want to and also "They don't know how to do that".
Ask ourselves, calculate one's efficiency is already hard, how to calculate one's effectiveness on other's efficiency. Just like author said.
> If individual employees are willing to lift their local team to 80% or 90% efficiency by burning their time on glue work, companies will take that free value
They take it for granted without really calculating the benefit. That is part of the reason why a small, gifted, and high-efficiency startup can operate and take over these giant company.
I don't know when these will end, no one know, but it seems that startup, especially ai industry begins to recruit again (From my experience), let see how the QE land next year
> I love this story because it shows, at least anecdotally, how deep scientific insights can emerge from the simplest of experiments. It's a testament to the idea that you don't always need sophisticated equipment to unlock the secrets of nature — sometimes, all it takes is a drop of oil and a bit of ingenuity.
Recently I have a harsh experience with my AWS account. I made a dumb thing, my email inbox is registered under a domain, and somehow my domain's MX record is gone and I can not receive email from AWS to authenticate to the right account to fix that MX record. So I am permanently banned away from that account due to the policy of AWS
Quite silly, yes. At the same time, I do think this scenario can represent a possibility when people need to rely on only one way to authenticate their entry. That is really frustrating when you make dumb thing under this circumstance.
That is an interesting aspect of thinking. I am wondering what is the drawback of allowing this entropy stream into their server besides the security concerns
> The results were a 90% reduction in costs and a 30% improvement in performance.
I am in a company with dedicated infra team and my CEO is a infra enthusiastic. He use terraform and k8s to build the company's infra. But the results are.
- Every deployment take days, in my experience, I need to woke for 24 hr streak to make it work.
- The infra is complicated to a level that quite hard to adjust
And benefits wise, I can't even think about it. We don't have many users so the claimed scalability is not even there.
I will strongly argue startup should not touch k8s until you have fair user base and retention.